On Jan 31, 12:45=A0pm, Werner <whetz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 8:18=A0am, Surfer <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:49:59 +1100, "Znobo" <zn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
>
> > >Rajendra Pachauri, the head of the U.N. Panel that shared the 2007
Nobe=
l
> > >Peace Prize with former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, said he would
look=
> > >into the apparent temperature plateau so far this century.
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_dimming
>
> > "Global dimming also creates a cooling effect that may have partially
> > masked the effect of greenhouse gases on global warming."
>
> There is a much better chance you will drown from debt than rising sea
> levels.
>
'> Around the end of the fist century predictions of the end of the
world
'> were common.
Such scaremongering has always been used. Where did this idea come
from anyway? It comes from 19th century theory which was entirely
abandoned by modern physics and chemistry until the 1960's when it was
revived by those diligent and illiterate theoretical academics of
climatology.
Because they are illiterate and have no interest in valid science,
this theoretical belief has continued. Regardless of the claims, there
is still nothing in modern science to sup****t the theoretical beliefs,
especially not any laboratory analysis of CO2. No evidence whatsoever
of the property of CO2 to inordinately absorb infrared radiation
energy and cause higher temperatures. CO2 has slightly higher heat
capacity than normal air. At concentrations less than 1%, any effect
upon air is negligible.
If the scientific theory of greenhouse gases were valid, it could
easily be demonstrated directly. It cannot and remains entirely a
theoretical conjecture that CO2 affects atmospheric temperatures.
If you analyse the theory of greenhouse gases and AGW, you will see
that it is entirely derived from the speculations of Tyndell. This
includes the idea that O2 and N2 are entirely unreactive to infrared,
and that CO2 absorbs and radiates at 15um. The only evidence is that
CO2 has dark spectroscopic bands of no transmission at 15um. The
laboratory data shows this as a LACK of radiation at this frequency
with studies of CO2 subjected to a continuous spectrum of the
infrared.
Who needs laboratory facts when one has the speculation from classical
theory of the great charlatan Tyndell.
Also inherent in AGW is false theoretical Planck curves.
Direct analyses with experiment shows the actual relative energy
distribution by frequency, but this is too much trouble to do***ent
for the scientific community too busy with it's political agenda of
instituting the state religion of climate fear, and the reformation of
our lifestyles to please the temperature gods, lest they turn us to
'toast' and send floods of wrath upon those unholy infidels that
continue to use fuel in modern lifestyles.
KD
The ****p of fools of the BELIEVERS in anthropogenic global warming
sails on,,
Next stop, the marina on No Paddle Island, up **** Creek
There has not been a shortage since. There was the Club
> Of Rome prediction of the early '70s that by this time we would all be
> breathing sulfuric acid. There was the Love Canal catastrophe which
> led to the creations of still another federal agency. Now Global
> Warming and sea level
rise.http://www.pacificmagazine.net/issue/2001/12/01=
/sea-levels-are-risinghttp://capitaldistrict-lp.org/Environment.shtmlhttp://=
capitaldistrict-lp.org/CleanEnvironmentMoney.shtmlhttp://capitaldistrict-lp.=
org/****kNotFish.shtml
|
