Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Play Stock Market Games
Fantasy Stock Picking Contest

Investments > Australian Investments > Re: P/V = NRT d...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 7 Topic 10396 of 13923
Post > Topic >>

Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases

by Hatto von Aquitanien <abbot@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 5, 2008 at 05:48 PM

Eric Gisse wrote:

> On Feb 5, 12:19 pm, kdth...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> On Feb 5, 2:46 pm, "hhc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <hhc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > On Feb 5, 2:40 pm, kdth...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>
>> > > P/V = NRT is the perfect gas law. It is derived from the fact that
at
>> > > low pressures, all gases obey this relation****p of temperature,
>> > > pressure and volume. In this formula, N is the number of moles.
>>
>> > OK, let's try this again. When you take a course in any of the hard
>> > sciences, you either work the homework problems, or you ended up
>> > ignorant.
>>
>> > I will bet you never worked any of the homework problems at the end
of
>> > each chapter. .
>>
>> > Harry C.
>>
>> That is cute. So let's see your homework. You are only indoctrinated
>> with a bunch of information you can repeat. Your education gives you
>> no ability to review and rationally analyse problems.
>>
>> So do you want to talk about my education? Just a diversion for
>> someone who does not understand his psuedo scientific indoctrination
>> and cannot discuss this very simple topic.
> 
> Oh, so when you only take the introductory courses it is enlightening,
> but when you take the more advanced courses it is indoctrination?
> 
> Or are you seriously claiming you didn't learn things like PV=nkT and
> Wein's law in a classroom?
> 
> [...]

I sure didn't.  I learned PV=NRT in (not P/V=NRT) in a classroom.  But the
rest of thermo and stat-mech I learned on my own.  I have to laugh at the
knuckle-dragging goons who call themselves physicist, but cannot
comprehend
the fact that the WTC was destroyed by controlled demolition.

http://books.google.com/books?id=vIw5m2XuvpIC&printsec=frontcover#PPA485,M1


-- 
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases
Hatto von Aquitanien <  2008-02-05 17:48:17 
Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases
"Androcles" <  2008-02-05 23:29:57 
Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases
Whata Fool <whata@[EMA  2008-02-05 20:40:12 
Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases
Talk-n-Dog <@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-05 23:21:02 
Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases
Hatto von Aquitanien <  2008-02-05 23:09:53 
Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases
David <nothere@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 05:38:25 
Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases
Hatto von Aquitanien <  2008-02-06 15:10:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 6:29:04 CST 2008.