Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Play Stock Market Games
Fantasy Stock Picking Contest

Investments > Australian Investments > Re: P/V = NRT d...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 3 Topic 10398 of 14069
Post > Topic >>

Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases

by Bill Ward <bward@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 5, 2008 at 05:51 PM

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:19:02 -0800, kdthrge wrote:

> On Feb 5, 2:46 pm, "hhc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <hhc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Feb 5, 2:40 pm, kdth...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>
>> > P/V = NRT is the perfect gas law. It is derived from the fact that at
>> > low pressures, all gases obey this relation****p of temperature,
>> > pressure and volume. In this formula, N is the number of moles.
>>
>> OK, let's try this again. When you take a course in any of the hard
>> sciences, you either work the homework problems, or you ended up
>> ignorant.
>>
>> I will bet you never worked any of the homework problems at the end of
>> each chapter. .
>>
>> Harry C.
> 
> That is cute. So let's see your homework. You are only indoctrinated
with
> a bunch of information you can repeat. Your education gives you no
ability
> to review and rationally analyse problems.
> 
> So do you want to talk about my education? Just a diversion for someone
> who does not understand his psuedo scientific indoctrination and cannot
> discuss this very simple topic.
> 
> What do you want to discuss next, Aristotle. Philosophy, exsitentialism,
> moral authority of scientists, the benefits of buying a $100,000 dollar
> piece of paper called a diploma, which you can hang on a wall but gives
> you no capability to discuss this simple problem which shows your
> indoctrination to be incompletely invalid and useless??
> 
> The laboratory facts are this:
> A gas injected into a container will bring the substance of the
container
> to it's temperature.
> If a metal container is injected with N2 gas, the container will come to
> the temperature of the gas. At this time, the outside surface of the
> container has a quantity of energy leaving it's surface according to
> Boltzman Stefan, 5.67E-5 ergs, cm-2, sec-1, degK-4.
> 
> THESE ARE FACTS. THE QUANTITY LEAVING THE SURFACE OF A HEATED BODY IS
> DEFINED BY BOLTZMAN STEFAN.
> This energy is a quantity and is always in compliance with the law of
the
> conservation of energy.
> 
> IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THIS ENERGY IS TRANSFERED BY MERE COLLISIONS OR
> CONDUCTION OF THE MOLECULES. ALTHOUGH THIS IS ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL TO
THE
> THEORY OF GRENHOUSE GASES.
> 
> If the temperature of the gas entering the container is increased but it
> is allowed to expand, the pressure remains the same.

It's easier for me to think about it as the gas being held at constant
pressure, such as with a weighted frictionless piston at the top of a
cylinder. Then when the gas is heated, the piston rises, doing mechanical
work without changing pressure.

> The collective energy
> of the collisions of the molecules is therfore the same. However, energy
> leaving the surface of the outside of the container increases as a
> fourth power to temperature. From 300K to 1000K, this is a 12,226%
> increase in energy.

KD, when the gas and container system radiates energy away, it cools,
unless an equal amount of energy is supplied to the system from outside
the system boundary.
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases
Bill Ward <bward@[EMAI  2008-02-05 17:51:47 
Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases
Bill Ward <bward@[EMAI  2008-02-06 14:10:37 
Re: P/V = NRT disproves theory of grenhouse gases
Bill Ward <bward@[EMAI  2008-02-06 14:44:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 18:35:25 CST 2008.