On Feb 5, 11:14 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
<Just...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Green Turtle" <SuperTur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:Pfigj.20787$EA5.14532@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > "B0NZ0" <boo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:4781a462$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Brrr! Where Did Global Warming Go?
>
> "Bonzo" <boo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Lies:
>
> > Sorry to expose your lies Popcock (not really!), but temperatures have
> > plateaued since 1998 DESPITE soaring CO2 levels.
> > Actually the globe has cooled a little since then and is now starting
a
> > cooling tend proper.
>
> You are a Habitual Liar Bonzo. Here is the temperature data and a plot
> showing the
> increase in temperaure since 1998.
>
> "HangEveryRepubliKKKan" <Just...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>
> >> 1998 14.57 *********************o*****
> >> 1999 14.33 *****************>>>>o
> >> 2000 14.33 *****************>>>>>o
> >> 2001 14.48 ************************o
> >> 2002 14.56 *************************o**
> >> 2003 14.55 **************************o*
> >> 2004 14.49 *************************>>o
> >> 2005 14.62 *****************************o**
> >> 2006 14.54 ***************************>>>o
>
> >> Look at all those "o"'s lined up there.
>
> "Bonzo" <boo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>
> > The "0"'s are NOT THE DATA!
> > They have created a trend which does not exist in the data.
> > Voodoo statistics!
>
> Ahahahahahahahahaha... Stupid KKKonservative KKKlown. A trendline
skirts
> across the top of the data leaving equal ****tions of the data above and
> below. In this instane 10 dots above, and 14 below as a result of the
crude
> nature of ascii graphics. Nevertheless it represents the best line that
can
> be fitted to the data based on minimizing the square of the distance
between
> the line and the real data. It's called a least squares curve fit.
>
> You are completely ignorant when it comes to statistics and
mathematics in
> general aren't you Bonzo.
>
> Ahahahahahaha.. You don't know what statistics are, where it comes
from,
> how it is used, or how to use it, and yet in your vast ignorance, you
seem
> to think that you know more about science than all of the worlds
scientists.
>
> "Voodoo statistics" Ahahahahahahahah... You need to go back to
public
> school and take a refresher course in basic technical literacy.
>
> Stupid... Stupid.. KKKonservative KKKlown....
>
> "Bonzo" <boo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>
> > Here is the data which shows NO TREND!
>
> > 1998 366.50 2.5721 14.57
> > 1999 368.14 2.6148 14.33
> > 2000 369.41 2.6399 14.33
> > 2001 371.07 2.6672 14.48
> > 2002 373.16 2.7032 14.56
> > 2003 375.80 2.7487 14.55
> > 2004 377.55 NA 14.49
> > 2005 379.75 NA 14.63
> > 2006 381.90 NA 14.54
>
> No? Lets plot the data and find out shall we? Here it is along with
the
> best linear fit to the data shown as "o".
>
> 1998 14.57 *********************o*****
> 1999 14.33 *****************>>>>o
> 2000 14.33 *****************>>>>>o
> 2001 14.48 ************************o
> 2002 14.56 *************************o**
> 2003 14.55 **************************o*
> 2004 14.49 *************************>>o
> 2005 14.62 *****************************o**
> 2006 14.54 ***************************>>>o
>
> Look at all those "o"'s lined up there. The trend is up, Up, UP.
>
> In fact the equation is...
>
> o = 14.42 + (0.0195 *(YEAR-1998))
>
> This shows a trend of 2'C (3.5'F) per century.
>
> So Bonzo, who is paying you to post lies to this newsgroup?
All that nonesense and
THAT IS THE ****ING BEST THAT YOU DINGBATS CAN COME UP WITH?
AN INCREASE OF 2 ****ING DEGREES CENTIGRADE PER CENTURY !!!!!!
you want us to get excited about 2 degrees per cetury?
ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR BLOODY MIND? FER CHRISSAKES!!!!
ALL CAPS INTENDED
|
