On Feb 8, 7:56=A0pm, mommycal...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Feb 7, 11:15 pm, "B0N0Z" <B0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Too bad so sad
>
> NASA announced in May 2004 that the UAH group found errors in their
> analysis of the Microwave Sounding Units on board NOAA satellites.
> Once the UAH group released thier corrected values the UAH group
> agreed that "for more than two decades, the troposphere has actually
> been warming faster than the surface. " "Thus, the real lower to
> middle troposphere trend appears to be around +0.10 to +0.13 deg K/
> decade uncorrected for stratospheric cooling, and +0.18 to 0.21 deg K/
> decade with this accounted for--exactly as predicted by theory and the
> latest models. Due to the problems I've described above, few people
> today believe UAH[Spencer and Christy]'s lower and middle troposphere
> trends. The only exceptions to this are global warming skeptics, who
> prefer them because they yield the desired low warming that their
> belief system requires."
>
> Try twisting data, peer-reviewed papers and press-releases using
> something more recent so you can demonstrate how foolish you are
This sounds like the sort of "data correction" that Michael Mann (et
al.) used to produce the famous hockey stick graph. Data should be
used to evaluate the theory. Not "corrected" so that it fits the
theory.
|
