"Addinall" <addinall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> > Here are the figures for the years 2002 -2004
> > 2002 14.56 ***************************0
> > 2003 14.55 ***************************0
> > 2004 14.49 *************************0
> > Care to plot a line?
V for Vendicar wrote:
> I could, but the correlation coefficient would be too small for it to be
> meaningful.
"Addinall" <addinall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> Sook. Why not? Is the interval not to your liking!?
MMMMMMMOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNN
There are insufficient years to be statistically significant.
"Addinall" <addinall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> Doesn't look very 'warm' does it?
MMMMMMMOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNN
Linerar Regression over 3 data points is statistically insignificant.
"Addinall" <addinall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> Brrrr...... Chilly in fact.......
MMMMMMMOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNN
Linerar Regression over 3 data points is statistically insignificant.
> "Addinall" <addin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>
> > Using a simplistic linear regression on an incomplete
> > set of data is meaningless.
>
> Since it is a time series, and time is infinite,
"Addinall" <addinall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> It is not. However, I rather doubt you are up to that
> pertikuler lesson.
The flow of time is infinite forward and backward. **** Sucker.
And your claim that a time series has to be followed from the start of
the
universe to the end is beyond childish stupidity.
> the set will never be
> complete. Hence by your AHAHAHAHAHA "logic" performing a regression on a
> time series is always meaningless.
"Addinall" <addinall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>> It is.
MMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN
Then by your KKKonservative Stupidity, all science and engineering is
impossible, since it is all based on the analysis of time series and other
non-infinite analogues.
"Addinall" <addinall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> No. I have rather a gifted ability with statistics. I see shapes
> in numbers. It's rather odd, but it makes me a good
> guesser.
We will see once you manage to get your grade 8 diploma.
|
