"Roger Coppock" <rcoppock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:67a2f087-759f-49e8-b641-2a774423b8e0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> March ties for 3rd warmest on NASA's 129-year record.
> Rank of the months of March
> Year Temp C Anomaly Z score
> 2002 14.84 0.842 2.92
> 2005 14.70 0.702 2.43
> 2008 14.67 0.672 2.33 <--
> 1990 14.67 0.672 2.33
> 2007 14.60 0.602 2.09
> 2004 14.59 0.592 2.05
> 1998 14.56 0.562 1.95
> 2006 14.55 0.552 1.91
> 2001 14.54 0.542 1.88
> 2003 14.51 0.512 1.78
> 1988 14.47 0.472 1.64
> 2000 14.46 0.462 1.60
> 1997 14.46 0.462 1.60
HMMMMMMMM ... let's see ...
.... the highest temperature is 14.84 and the lowest is 14.46, which
gives a range of 0.38.
So, Coppcock what would be the uncertainty in these measurements?
At a guess, say plus or minus 0.2 degrees at least?
So the top temp would be 14.84 plus or minus 0.2, giving a lower limit
of 14.64.
The lowest temp would be 14.46 plus or minus 0.2 giving an upper limit
of 14.66.
ERGO your table is ABSOLUTELY MEANINGLESS!
You are blathering on as if these figures have no uncertainties.
Then there is also the not insignificant matter of UHI to be
considered.
You are a blithering fool!
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
". researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Solar Research in Germany
re****t the sun has been burning more brightly over the last 60 years,
accounting for the 1 degree Celsius increase in Earth's temperature over
the last 100 years."
http://ibdeditorial.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=287279412587175
