Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Play Stock Market Games
Fantasy Stock Picking Contest

Investments > Australian Investments > Re: Some even s...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 10971 of 13087
Post > Topic >>

Re: Some even simpler questions for the GPC lobby

by "0BN0Z" <0BN0Z@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 11, 2008 at 01:23 PM

"Fran" <Fran.Beta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:148a8b14-3e92-4783-8394-7cedd810a33f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Apr 11, 12:01 am, Tunderbar <tdcom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
It's a common place for those of the GPC lobby to wave their hands in
the direction of Paleozoic history and say things like 'climate
changes have marked the history of the Earth' and 'the current
atmosphere is, in geological terms, CO2-poor' and 'temperatures have
been much hotter than this in the distant past'. They want of course
to sound well informed, and to make the current changes seem
relatively insignificant.
******************


The changes in CO2 levels over the last 150 years ARE relatively 
insignificant,
and we're not even sure they're anthropogenic!
They have had virtually no effect on global temperatures.
Global temperatures were warmer during the
Mediaeval Warm Period and cooler during the e.g. Maunder Minimum.
All natural variability due to solar influences.



*********************
a) At what point do rising CO2 concentrations become a problem? A
related question would be: at what moment before that point is reached
would human intervention be compelled to stop it reaching that point?
**********************


CO2 levels are nowhere near being a problem and will probably never be 
in the foreseeable future.
We are not even sure that the insigificant rise of CO2 over the last 150 
years is anthropogenic.
We have no control over CO2 levels in the atmosphere.
It might even be a totally natural variation.



*******************************
b)   At what point do mean near surface temperatures become a problem?
*********************************



Mean near surface temperatures could become a problem in the unlikely 
event they rise significantly.
In the current global cooling environment, this possibility is becoming 
more remote by the day.




**************************
c) Bearing in mind that something like 60-70% of us humans live within
80 km of the sea coast, at what point would rising sea-levels be a
problem?   At what point before further deglaciation occurs must
humans intervene to prevent it?
*************************************




Sea levels are not rising significantly and any "deglaciation"
is part of natural variability and appears to be about to reverse.


-- 


Warnest Regards

Bonzo

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods 
but by perpetual repetition." Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of 
Meteorology, MIT
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: Some even simpler questions for the GPC lobby
"0BN0Z" <0BN  2008-04-11 13:23:56 
Re: Some even simpler questions for the GPC lobby
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-04-16 06:12:09 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Sep 6 20:54:31 CDT 2008.