"John M." <john_howard_morgan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:c0622fbe-5852-4bcb-a316-10c0851e212a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 11, 5:04 am, "0BN0Z" <0B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>> "Earl Evleth" <evl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> news:C42421A7.11CF76%evleth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > On 10/04/08 19:52, in article
>> > 5ce43fa1-475d-4af3-b3d2-151b97ffc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > "Tunderbar" <tdcom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> Pretty imaginative way to evade the question.
>> > More imaginative than your questions!
>> Another evasive "answer"!
>> Cat got your tongue as well?
>> If you guys say that global warming is ALL BAD,
>> then what do you guys say about global cooling
>> and what do you guys consider to be the optinal global temperature?
>> Sounds like a logical question to me.
> Yet entirely illogical. You can discover why this is by reading:
I totally disagree, the questions are logical!
If you guys aren't happy with a slight global warming over 150 years,
what sort of climate are you after?
Climate has NEVER been static.
Methinks you guys have the audacity and stupidity to believe
that you can work against nature to maintain a static climate!
ROTFLMAO
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"CO2 variations show little correlation with our planet's climate on
long, medium and even short time scales." R. Timothy Patterson,
Professor Of Geology, Director Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Center,
Carleton University, Canada
|
