"Fran" <franbarlow@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:9cba6c69-bcd3-4d14-89e3-052554ade9e1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Anyway, it is unlikely we will ever get to 1000 since plant growth
> will explode
You're probably right because 'we' (i.e you and I and the vast
majority of those able to read this right now) won't be alive when CO2
reaches 1000 PPM, which probably won't occur this side of 2096. At
least, one would hope so.
So why would an atheistic socialist be concerned about
what could possibly happen once they become nothing more
than a pile of dust????
I'm puzzled!
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"In scientific circles, C02 is referred to as a `trace gas' that, for
hundreds of thousands of years, has remained at or below five
ten-thousandths of the atmosphere by volume. Even among the so-called
`greenhouse gases' (GHG), C02 accounts for less than 4%, with water
vapour being by far the most significant GHG. C02 is clearly a
miniscule component of the massive mechanisms that create climate and
cause climate change."
Dr. Timothy Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Steward****p Project
(NRSP.com), Former Professor Of Climatology, University of Winnipeg
|
