On Apr 12, 6:04 am, "0BN0Z" <0B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> "John M." <john_howard_mor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:5845a984-454d-4139-abfd-6ac2ea4fd883@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On Apr 11, 3:24 am, Poetic Justice <@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Dog.com> wrote:
> >> Al Bedo wrote:
> >> > Roger Coppock wrote:
> >> >> On Apr 10, 7:01 am, Tunderbar <tdcom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >>> OK, so far no agwer will admit that there is anything at all good
> >> >>> about global warming, other than one who said that it will kill
> >> >>> humans
> >> >>> and one that said that when agw hits, sup****ters of the oil
> >> >>> industry
> >> >>> will be torn limb from limb. Not exactly answering the question,
> >> >>> but
> >> >>> certainly showing some interesting trend of bias and agenda.
>
> >> >> No bias, Dunderbar, beyond the simple fact that when
> >> >> m***** of people are starved they get mad.
>
> >> > So far the m***** that are starving are due to a stupid response
> >> > (Ethanol) to a non-problem: globull worming.
>
> >> M***** are starving due to Liberals that aren't starving.
>
> > Thomas Malthus explained the inevitable occurrence of food shortages
> > over two centuries ago.
>
> And he was wrong.
As annual global average food supply has not increased in line with
population increases, he seems to have been spot on.
> Starvation was on the decrease until the madness of the AGW biofuel
> agenda started pu****ng food prices up recently.
Malthus did not engage in dotting 'i's and crossing 't's. He observed
the rather obvious connection between two fundamental variables and
extrapolated likely trends in each.
> Obviously Malthus couldn't foresee the madness of the rabid socialist
> biofuel agenda!
Oh. So market forces are because of socialism, are they. You need a
few lessons in how global capitalism operates and its differences from
demand economics.
|
