On Apr 19, 7:33 am, Bill Ward <bw...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:35:21 +1000, 0NB0Z wrote:
>
> > "John M." <john_howard_mor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>news:3c633412-9b64-446d-82ee-5b52af96b511@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> On Apr 18, 7:30 am, "0NB0Z" <0N...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
> >>> "Ouroboros_Rex" <i...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >>>news:fu86qr$cc2$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>> > matt_sykes wrote:
> >>> >> Since we havent had 30 years of warming we arent in a warming
trend
> >>> >> (your deffinition) , correct?
> >>> >> (Oh-bore-us-wrecks, please dont bother responding unless you
> >>> >> actually
> >>> >> want to debate something)
> >>> > Not a problem, let's get started. Based on the facts, what makes
> >>> > you
> >>> > think we have not had 30 years of warming?
>
> >>> HMMMMMMMM ...
>
> >>> Let's see, cooling from 1940 to 1980, then warming from 1980 to
1998,
> >>> then cooling from 1998 to the present.
>
> >> You missed out the change 1940 to present. Perhaps your arithmetic is
> >> different to mine but I make that > 30 yrs.
>
> > CHERRYPICKING!
> > You left out the cooling trends 1940 to 1980, and 1998 to the present!
>
> It doesn't really matter, Bonzo. Even if we had perfect temperature
data
> for the last million years, it would be no help in predicting future
> climate changes. Chaos is inherently unpredictable. Weather is chaotic
> by definition, climate is low-passed weather and thus must also be
> chaotic.
Nope. A nice non-sequitur for the books, however.
|
