Re: This is simply a lie.

"Roger Coppock" <rcoppock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:e93b010e-e679-4144-8f9f-330e2efe1a5d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Apr 21, 5:35 pm, "$27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto"
<rander3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Notice something? As evidence against global warming theory mounts,
> the "s***" have been ****fting terminology. Now, instead of "global
> warming" they're using "climate change" more often. This no doubt
> comes from shrewd spin doctors who are the same FILTHY kind as work
> for corrupt politicians. Just keep watching what comes out of the
> ignorant and compliant media sources.
NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH.  The tactic
of replacing the phrase "Climate Change" with "Global
Warming" came from the Luntz memo, a Republican Party
strategy paper.
***********************


ROTFLMAO
Don't get your balls in a knot over a name Coppcock!
So you are trying to kid us that the very same people who are
currently running a global scaremongering competition
would switch to a name like "climate change"
because it is less scary than "global warming"??????!!!!!!
PULL THE OTHER ONE BABY!
A socialist political agenda by any other name would smell as bad!



Regards

Bonzo

"What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude the 
principal risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich 
countries?...In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the 
only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? 
Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about?" Maurice Strong,1990