On Apr 22, 9:48=A0am, Poetic Justice <@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Tunderbar wrote:
> > On Apr 22, 12:23 am, sir.jpturc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> On 22 avr, 07:00, "0NBZ0" <0N...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> "Roger Coppock" <rcopp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>>>news:e93b010e-e679-4144-8f9f-330e2efe1a5d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> On Apr 21, 5:35 pm, "$27 TRILLION to pay for
Kyoto"<rander3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> Notice something? As evidence against global warming theory mounts,
> >>>> the "s***" have been ****fting terminology. Now, instead of "global
> >>>> warming" they're using "climate change" more often. This no doubt
> >>>> comes from shrewd spin doctors who are the same FILTHY kind as work
> >>>> for corrupt politicians. Just keep watching what comes out of the
> >>>> ignorant and compliant media sources.
> >>> NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH. =A0The tactic
> >>> of replacing the phrase "Climate Change" with "Global
> >>> Warming" came from the Luntz memo, a Republican Party
> >>> strategy paper.
> >>> ***********************
> >>> ROTFLMAO
> >>> Don't get your balls in a knot over a name Coppcock!
> >>> So you are trying to kid us that the very same people who are
> >>> currently running a global scaremongering competition
> >>> would switch to a name like "climate change"
> >>> because it is less scary than "global warming"??????!!!!!!
> >>> PULL THE OTHER ONE BABY!
> >>> A socialist political agenda by any other name would smell as bad!
> >>> Regards
> >>> Bonzo
> >>> "What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude the
> >>> principal risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich
> >>> countries?...In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't
the=
> >>> only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations
collaps=
e?
> >>> Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about?" Maurice
Strong,1990
> >> What is not a lie is the invasion by sea water of aquifers in
> >> Australia up to 150 miles inland ... I mean you can check that for
> >> yourself.
>
> That would indicate that Australia has a problem with a drought....
> since Florida would also have sea water intrusion into wells if it were
> Global.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Or pulling too much water from the aquifer. You know, wells and
irrigation. It's got NOTHING to do with agw.
|
