Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Play Stock Market Games
Fantasy Stock Picking Contest

Investments > Australian Investments > AGW Is Junk Sci...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 49 Topic 11230 of 14069
Post > Topic >>

AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition

by "0NBZ0" <0NBZ0@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 23, 2008 at 04:25 PM

An apt quote!!!


QUOTE: "If scientists say they are 100% sure, or that they are 
absolutely certain about the cause and effect and ignore variables which 
might show that they could be wrong, they are practicing junk science.

Junk science happens when scientists believe something based on just 
some of what they see."



Nancy Salvato

April 22, 2008

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2726







The above sounds like a lot of "scientists" to me!
 




 49 Posts in Topic:
AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"0NBZ0" <0NB  2008-04-23 16:25:43 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
chemist <tom-bolger@[E  2008-04-23 02:47:07 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"Ouroboros_Rex"  2008-04-23 09:47:47 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"alanmc95210@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 21:01:23 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
neutralino@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-27 16:13:03 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-03 17:41:11 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"John M." <j  2008-05-10 13:27:43 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
neutralino@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-25 10:13:24 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-04-25 14:59:35 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-04-30 00:51:50 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
neutralino@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-25 15:44:48 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-04-25 19:36:07 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-04-30 00:53:18 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
Whata Fool <whata@[EMA  2008-04-26 05:24:21 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-03 13:09:39 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
Whata Fool <whata@[EMA  2008-05-03 22:37:06 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-03 23:56:02 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
neutralino@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-25 17:23:24 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-04-30 00:54:12 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
neutralino@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-26 14:45:40 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
Whata Fool <whata@[EMA  2008-04-26 20:46:38 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
neutralino@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-04-26 21:22:39 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
Whata Fool <whata@[EMA  2008-04-27 15:37:53 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-03 13:06:09 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
Whata Fool <whata@[EMA  2008-05-03 22:33:03 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-03 23:54:28 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
mrbawana2u <mrbawana2u  2008-04-27 08:22:12 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-04-30 00:56:14 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-04-30 00:48:38 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"alanmc95210@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 13:51:03 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-06 16:11:47 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
neutralino@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-05 20:57:47 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
Claudius Denk <claudiu  2008-05-05 22:09:33 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-06 16:14:04 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
neutralino@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-05 23:48:52 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
Claudius Denk <claudiu  2008-05-06 07:39:49 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
neutralino@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-06 17:46:27 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
neutralino@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-06 17:49:23 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
mrbawana2u <mrbawana2u  2008-05-09 13:42:41 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-10 03:04:36 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"alanmc95210@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 19:54:30 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
Claudius Denk <claudiu  2008-05-09 20:26:20 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
neutralino@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-09 23:05:39 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
mrbawana2u <mrbawana2u  2008-05-10 13:23:16 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-11 01:54:10 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"John M." <j  2008-05-10 13:35:40 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"alanmc95210@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 08:35:04 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"Ouroboros_Rex"  2008-04-23 09:47:28 
Re: AGW Is Junk Science. Here Is A Definition
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-04-29 23:53:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 0:31:39 CST 2008.