Talk About Network

Google





Play Stock Market Games
Fantasy Stock Picking Contest

Investments > Australian Investments > Sunspot Facts F...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 11362 of 14278
Post > Topic >>

Sunspot Facts From A Geologist

by "0BZN0" <0BZN0@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 30, 2008 at 04:38 PM

Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus Geology, Western Wa****ngton 
University, author of 8 books, 150 journal publications with focus on 
geomorphology; glacial geology; Pleistocene geochronology; environmental 
and engineering geology.

CBS-TV, 60 Minutes, Burlington, Wa****ngton

March 30, 2008



http://icecap.us/images/uploads/DonEasterbrookInterviewTranscript.pdf





KLC: What about the claim by Hansen and others that TSI [Total Solar 
Irradiance] has been unchanged for 80 years, thus it cannot explain 
recent global warming?



DJE: Not true. If you look at the data coming out, you see a strong 
correlation between global temperature and irradiance. If you plot 
irradiance versus sunspots, you again get the same kind of curve, and 
the inference is you can connect these curves to recognize a link 
between global temperatures and the sunspot cycle. We only have 
satellite measurements back to about 1970, thirty-some years of data, 
and the change is about a tenth of one-percent. That's more than the 
eight one-thousandths of a percent of CO2 change, so they say the TSI 
change is not enough?

The argument I make is that the correlation between sunspot activity and 
temperature is not fortuitous-it can't be. There must be a cause and 
effect relation****p. We don't know what the connection is, but it is 
obvious that a small change in solar irradiance produces a big climate 
change. It's leveraged by something, maybe by water va****. We're not 
sure. The argument that it's not big enough? A friend of mine has a

saying which I love. "If it happened, then it must be possible." Well, 
it happened, so it must be possible.


-- 


Warmest Regards

Bonzo

"From 1870 to 1900, we had global cooling, then we had significant 
global warming from about 1910 to 1945. That global warming is not 
accompanied by any significant rise in CO2, so you can't blame CO2. Then 
CO2 increased while we had global cooling. You can't blame that on CO2. 
It's only been the last 30 years there's been correlation between CO2 
and global warming" Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus Geology, 
Western Wa****ngton University
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Sunspot Facts From A Geologist
"0BZN0" <0BZ  2008-04-30 16:38:07 
Re: Sunspot Facts From A Geologist
Roedy Green <see_websi  2008-04-30 06:53:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 23:04:23 PST 2009.