On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:55:57 -0400, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "V-for-Vendicar"
<Justice@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>Bonzo "global temperature has risen only marginally over the last 150
years"
Well, he's definitely wrong about that, as shown here...
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/gcag/index.jsp
....but perhaps the data would be more informative if viewed
in this context:
http://www.worldclimatere****t.com/index.php/2008/02/11/a-2000-year-global-temperature-record/
Humans definitely contribute more than a bit, since the
physics of greenhouse gases can't really be denied, but the
effect is obviously in addition to a natural cycle. Pity we
don't have enough data (yet) to generate a 10,000-year
chart; more information is always valuable.
>Ahahahahahahahaha
>
>MMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOONNNNN
Well, yeah, and dishonest besides, since 150 years of data
isn't really useful for showing or forecasting long-term
climatological trends even if it sup****ted his claim, which
it doesn't.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
|
