"Roger Coppock" <rcoppock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:8282e03b-0325-46ab-b1fb-5e4e88a9844d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 30, 3:58 pm, pseudom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> http://www.junkscience.com/blog_js/2008/01/25/warming-trend-pdo-and-s...
>
> "...An R2 correlation of 0.83 would be considered “good”. This
> indicates that PDO and our surface temperature is more closely tied
> together than Co2 to surface temperature by almost a factor of 2."
>
> /leebert
USHCN data only cover the Continental US, less than
1 and 1/2 percent of the globe. Come back when you
want to discuss GLOBAL warming.
*********************************
ROTFLMAO
So your fake CO2 correlation only applies to parts of the globe eh
Coppcock???
IOW the correlation with CO2 which you drone on and on about doesn't
apply to the US then!!!!!!!!!
The excellent correlation (just look at the graph!)
between temperature and solar irradiance is striking!
Bad luck for you and your zealot pals Coppcock!!!
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
“From 1870 to 1900, we had global cooling, then we had significant
global warming from about 1910 to 1945. That global warming is not
accompanied by any significant rise in CO2, so you can’t blame CO2. Then
CO2 increased while we had global cooling. You can’t blame that on CO2.
It’s only been the last 30 years there’s been correlation between CO2
and global warming” Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus Geology,
Western Wa****ngton University
|
