"Roger Coppock" <rcoppock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:30ad7303-5fa3-4ff8-826e-fcc6d0afd7eb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 30, 4:28 pm, Al Bedo <c...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Roger Coppock wrote:
> > On Apr 30, 3:58 pm, pseudom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>>http://www.junkscience.com/blog_js/2008/01/25/warming-trend-pdo-and-s...
>
> >> "...An R2 correlation of 0.83 would be considered “good”. This
> >> indicates that PDO and our surface temperature is more closely tied
> >> together than Co2 to surface temperature by almost a factor of 2."
>
> >> /leebert
>
> > USHCN data only cover the Continental US, less than
> > 1 and 1/2 percent of the globe. Come back when you
> > want to discuss GLOBAL warming.
>
> You mean global warming won't effect the US?
LOL! Are you dumb or playing at it, Al?
******************
You're the dumb one baby!
******************
1.46% of the global area trapped in a narrow latitude band
inside one continent is not a good sample of the globe's
surface
***************************
IOW your fake CO2 correlation IS NOT GLOBAL!
You obviously didn't read the following ....
To ensure that was not just an artifact of the United States data, we
did a similar correlation of the CO2 with the CRU global and MSU lower
tropospheric monthlies over the same period. We found a similar non
existent correlation of just 0.02 for CRU and 0.01 for the MSU over
troposphere.
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"CO2 variations show little correlation with our planet's climate on
long, medium and even short time scales." R. Timothy Patterson,
Professor Of Geology, Director Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Center,
Carleton University, Canada .
|
