On May 4, 11:40=A0pm, "00ZBN" <00...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Roger Coppock" <rcopp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:757f0a5e-3256-4ed3-baf4-cba0c949dcc4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > There's very little difference between the 3 major
> > presidential hopefuls on global warming issues.
> > Look how this article strains to find a difference.
> >http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/05/04/politics/main4069221.shtml
>
> But they dare not make too much noise about their wacky beliefs lest
> they ruin their chances!
> I have not heard one peep!
Then you have not read the article at the URL above.
>
> Warmest Regards
>
> Bonzo
>
> The Fourth Report of the IPCC might just as well decree the
> suppression of all climatology textbooks, and replace them in our
> schools with press communiqu=E9s. ... Day after day, the same mantra -
> that 'the Earth is warming up' - is churned out in all its forms. As
> 'the
> ice melts' and 'sea level rises' the Apocalypse looms ever nearer!
> Without realizing it, or perhaps without wishing to, the average
> citizen in bamboozled, lobotomized, and lulled into mindless acceptance.
> ... Non-believers in the greenhouse scenario are in the
> position of those long ago who doubted the existence of God ...
> Marcel Leroux
>
> It should be abundantly clear by now that the AGW hypothesis is
> contradicted by the facts/measurements/observations and should
> therefore be abandoned and be substituted by a hypothesis which
> better matches the facts.
> - Hans Labohm
