On Sat, 10 May 2008 22:33:48 -0400, V-for-Vendicar wrote:
>>> And that makes you a Liar Fritz.
>
>
> "fritz" <fritz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> Oh, really ???
>>
>> 1998 14.57
>> 2007 14.57
>>
>> Who is lying here, eh ?
>
> You are, Fritzie. You don't compute a trend by drawing a straight
> line
> between the first and last sample, ignoring all of the data inbetween.
>
> Obviously you know nothing about statistical analysis.
>
> And that makes you a MMMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOONNNNNNNN
> Fritz
>
>
> "fritz" <fritz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>> The global warming true believers have a big problem with their flakey
>> excuses for global cooling.
>
> What cooling Fritzie? The following data shows global temperatures
> are
> rising at a rate of about 2'C per century.
>
> And that makes you a low-grade moron
>
> Here are the global average temperatures over the last decade. "o" =
> trend line.
>
> ==
>
> 1998 14.57 *********************o***** 1999 14.33
> *****************=====o
> 2000 14.33 *****************======o
> 2001 14.48 ************************o 2002 14.56
> *************************o** 2003 14.55 **************************o*
> 2004 14.49 *************************==o 2005 14.63
> *****************************o** 2006 14.54
> ***************************===o 2007 14.57
> *****************************
>
> Look at all those "o"'s lined up there. The trend is up, Up, UP.
>
> And the rate of increase is about 2'C per century.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5
re****t from R
> temp <- c(14.57, 14.33, 14.33, 14.48, 14.56, 14.55, 14.49, 14.63,
14.54, 14.57)
> year <- 1998:2007
> summary(lm(temp~year))
Call:
lm(formula = temp ~ year)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-0.129697 -0.038742 -0.007182 0.057030 0.146545
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) -21.782727 19.927508 -1.093 0.306
year 0.018121 0.009951 1.821 0.106
Residual standard error: 0.09039 on 8 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-Squared: 0.293, Adjusted R-squared: 0.2047
F-statistic: 3.316 on 1 and 8 DF, p-value: 0.1061
which means that there is no evidence for linear trend
lining up << all those "o"'s >> does not mean anything
z
|
