Re: New Jason Satellite Indicates 23 Year Global Cooling

V-for-Vendicar <Justice@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:t1QVj.78225$dA2.38854@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >> "fritz" <fritz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >> > The global warming true believers have a big problem with their
flakey
> >> > excuses for global cooling.
> 
> V for Vendicar wrote:
> >>    What cooling Fritzie?  The following data shows global
temperatures 
> >> are
> >> rising at a rate of about 2'C per century.
> 
> 
> "fritz" <fritz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> > You admit there was global cooling during the last century...you don't

> > remember ???
> 
>   Why do you see the slight global cooling of 60 years ago a "big
problem" 
> for the current observation that the globe has been rapidly warming
since 
> that time, and far exceeding the slight cooling that occurred?

Because it shows that the GW models are flakey at best.
They are made to fit the historical data, which means they require
constant 
fiddling to match the data set. Todays GW model gets adjusted because of
yesterdays data. They have proven to be next-to-useless in the true test
of scientific models - accuracy of prediction. 

> 
>   You were told the mechanism.  The mechanism was reduced sunlight
reaching 
> the surface of the earth as a result
> of the suspension of particles of SMOG (sulphate particulates primarily)
in 
> the air.

Another unproven GW theory - more unproven speculation that GW true
believers
lap up.
 
>   You seem to be trying to conflate the currently observed warming with
the 
> minute cooling that occurred in the 40's.
> 
>   You wouldn't be that stupid now would you Fritzie?

You are pretty dumb if you believe that GW computer models are anywhere
near
accurate at predicting future climate.

Climate change is normal, adapt or die is the lesson from evolution.