Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Investments > Australian Investments > Re: Engineering...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 11504 of 12300
Post > Topic >>

Re: Engineering Opinion At Wikipedia

by "V-for-Vendicar" <Justice@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 14, 2008 at 07:25 PM

"00ZBN" <00ZBN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> Connolley is not only a big shot on Wikipedia, he's a big shot at
> Wikipedia -- an Administrator with unusual editorial clout. Using that
> clout, this 40-something scientist of minor relevance gets to tear down
> scientists of great accomplishment. Because Wikipedia has become the
> single biggest reference source in the world, and global warming is one
> of the most sought after subjects, the ability to control information on
> Wikipedia by taking down authoritative scientists is no trifling matter.


A current list of the stated Global Warming Conspirators.


01) The New York Times
02) Virtually Every Scientist on earth
03) all of the scientific press, both journals and textbooks
04) All Environmentalists
05) the vast majority of anyone with an advanced degree
06) the UN
07) the IPCC
08) All professional scientific societies, but the Petroleum Institute
09) U.S. Defense Department
10) Wikipedia
11) The World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
12) The National Auronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
13) The British Antarctic Survey
14) The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
15) Realclimate.org
16) The Hadley Center
17) The Royal Society
18) The Royal Astronomical Society
19) The National Academy of Sciences
20) The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
21) The American Physical Society
22) The American Institute of Physics
23) The Woods Hole Research Centre
24) The American Chemical Society (ACS)
25) The American Geophysical Union (AGU)
26) The U.S. Geophysical Service (USGS)
27) The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
28) The National Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
29) The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS)
30) The National Wildlife Federation (NWF)
31) The World Wildlife Federation (WWF)
32) The Audubon Society
33) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
34) Accuweather
35) Greenpiece
36) The world Conservation Union
37) The Sierra Club.
38) The board and article reviewers of the journal Nature
39) The board and article reviewers of the journal Science
40) The staff of Scientific American magazine
41) The staff of New Scientist Magazine.
42) The Queen of England
43) Michael Gorbachev
44) Muammar al-Gaddafi
45) Maurece Strong
46) Bill Gates
47) Ted Turner
48) Warren Buffet
49) Rupert Murdoch
50) Bill Moyers
51) Dr. David Suzuki
52) Stephen Hawking
53) ABC News
54) NBC News
55) CBS News
56) The Public Broadcasting system

57) And lets not forget - Al Gore.
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Engineering Opinion At Wikipedia
"00ZBN" <00Z  2008-05-07 12:59:28 
Re: Engineering Opinion At Wikipedia
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-14 19:25:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Jul 9 5:53:37 CDT 2008.