by "V-for-Vendicar" <Justice@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 15, 2008 at 12:16 AM
"00ZBN" <00ZBN@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> "From 1870 to 1900, we had global cooling, then we had significant
> global warming from about 1910 to 1945. That global warming is not
> accompanied by any significant rise in CO2, so you can't blame CO2. Then
> CO2 increased while we had global cooling. You can't blame that on CO2.
> It's only been the last 30 years there's been correlation between CO2
> and global warming" Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus Geology,
> Western Wa****ngton University
Easterbrook is known for his claim that there is a strong correlation
between sunspot numbers and global
surface temperatures.
Here is the data..... There is no correlation.
BONZO = MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN
View with mono spaced font.
No correlation between sunspot number and global average temperature
1958 -> 2007
|
|
| *
|
| * * *
| * *
|
| * *
|
^|
T| *
e| *
m| *
p| * *
e|
r| * *
a| *
t| o o
u| oo oooo o ooo o oo o oo oooo oo o ooo
r| * * * *
e| *
| * * * *
| * *
| * * *
| * * *
| * *
| *
| *
| * *
|
| *
| *
+-----------------------CO2->----------------------------------------------
* = Data
0 = Computed Regression
Y = Mx+B
M = 4.976998E-05 B = 14.18044
Correlation Coefficient .01161709
