Talk About Network

Google





Play Stock Market Games
Fantasy Stock Picking Contest

Investments > Australian Investments > When Candidates...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 6 Topic 11623 of 14278
Post > Topic >>

When Candidates Are Dangerously Wrong

by "00ZNB" <00ZNB@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 15, 2008 at 05:00 PM

May 14, 2008



http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/3071



There is a price for being an idiot. Think about that the next time you 
fill up your gas tank.



Americans have painted themselves into the corner on energy and the two 
presumptive candidates for President are ready to finish off the nation 
with the worst possible "solutions."



Sen. Barrack Obama is talking of "windfall profits" taxes on the oil 
companies, thus threatening to take away the money they need to invest 
in exploration, extraction, refining and delivery of the gas and oil we 
need to fuel our cars and trucks, and heat our homes.



It takes up to ten years between finding a new reserve of oil and 
actually delivering it. It's been nearly four decades since any oil 
company has built a new refinery because the United States has made it 
too expensive to do so thanks to lawsuits and a maze of environmental 
laws. As for exploring for oil in the U.S. or off-shore, would you spend 
millions doing that if you knew the government wouldn't let you drill or 
extract it?



Like Sen. McCain, Sen. Obama believes in global warming even though the 
planet stopped its long, completely natural warming in 1998. The Earth 
is cooling, but please don't let that get in the way of either candidate 
proposing "solutions" to address a drastic warming that is not 
happening.



Sen. John McCain says that global warming in undeniable even though 
literally hundreds of scientists worldwide say it isn't happening. In 
March I attended a conference on climate change sponsored by the 
Heartland Institute. It attracted over 500 meteorologists, 
climatologists, economists, and other very smart people from around the 
world who sat through two days of presentations and seminars all jammed 
with information confirming that there is no global warming, if you 
interpret this to mean a massive rise in the temperature of the planet.



Sen. McCain, however, is worried about "carbon fuel emissions" at a time 
when the cost of those carbon fuels, gasoline in particular, is going 
through the ceiling thanks, not to a lack of supply, but the speculators 
in the world's commodity exchanges.



It is moronic to worry about carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) when this 
gas, vital to the growth of every piece of vegetation and all life on 
Earth, constitutes a mere 0.038% of the Earth's atmosphere.



Look up at the sky above you. It's about 95% water va****. You know, 
water as in hydrogen and oxygen molecules. You drink it. You wash in it. 
You swim in it. There are large bodies of it called oceans. Those oceans 
which normally retain and release 80-90% of the Earth's heat are now 
cooling!



So neither one of the candidates has a grasp of economics or science and 
we are about to elect one of them the next President of the United 
States of America!



Meanwhile, The New York Times on May 11 published an editorial, 
"Rethinking Ethanol" in which the geniuses who write such things have 
concluded that maybe diverting food products like corn into a fuel 
product that provides less mileage per gallon, costs more to produce 
than gasoline, and adds its own pollution to the air, is probably not a 
good idea. Their solution? End the tax subsidy that goes to ethanol 
producers.



According to The New York Times, "The other reason is a spate of studies 
suggesting that some biofuels-corn ethanol in particular-could 
accelerate global warming." You have to be a special kind of idiot to 
(1) advocate a Congressional mandate for billions of gallons of ethanol 
as a gasoline additive and (2) continue to maintain that global warming 
is occurring.



The New York Times has been lying about global warming since the 1980s. 
The good news is that it is laying off large numbers of its re****ters 
and editors. Its circulation has been sinking like a stone and maybe 
someday it will be sold on street corners as a single broadsheet hawked 
by boys ****vering in the snow while shouting, "Read all about it! No 
more global warming!"



If you get the feeling that the United States is heading over the cliff 
for failing to anticipate and encourage its energy industries, for 
codifying in law requirements to deal with a non-existent problem, and 
for refusing to reverse course, you're right.



There is a price for being an idiot. Think about that the next time you 
fill up your gas tank.
-- 


Warmest Regards

Bonzo


"Let me say it plainly: The environmental movement has been taken over 
by anti-capitalist radicals who are using it to wage war against 
capitalism and campaign for liberal Democrats. Protecting the 
environment is now number three, or lower, on their list of priorities." 
Joe Bast, President, Heartland Institute, One-time Ardent 
Environmentalist, Has seen it from both sides.
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
When Candidates Are Dangerously Wrong
"00ZNB" <00Z  2008-05-15 17:00:01 
Re: When Candidates Are Dangerously Wrong
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-15 03:21:36 
Re: When Candidates Are Dangerously Wrong
"Seon Ferguson"  2008-05-15 20:14:13 
Re: When Candidates Are Dangerously Wrong
"00ZNB" <00Z  2008-05-16 12:27:28 
Re: When Candidates Are Dangerously Wrong
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-17 02:51:06 
Re: When Candidates Are Dangerously Wrong
"Ouroboros_Rex"  2008-05-15 09:31:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 18:17:31 PST 2009.