by "V-for-Vendicar" <Justice@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 15, 2008 at 03:29 AM
"0BZN0" <0BZN0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> "Every year they recalibrate their computer model and put in the
> observed temperature. So, as they go along, the curve that trails behind
> is perfect. It's like predicting the morning's weather at six-o'clock in
> the evening.." Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus Geology,
> Western Wa****ngton University
Easterbrook is fond of claiming that there is a strong correlation
between
sunspot numbers and global
average temperatures.
Here is the data. No Correlation.
View with mono spaced font.
No correlation between sunspot number and global average temperature
1958 -> 2007
|
|
| *
|
| * * *
| * *
|
| * *
|
^|
T| *
e| *
m| *
p| * *
e|
r| * *
a| *
t| o o
u| oo oooo o ooo o oo o oo oooo oo o ooo
r| * * * *
e| *
| * * * *
| * *
| * * *
| * * *
| * *
| *
| *
| * *
|
| *
| *
+-----------------------CO2->----------------------------------------------
* = Data
0 = Computed Regression
Y = Mx+B
M = 4.976998E-05 B = 14.18044
Correlation Coefficient .01161709