On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:55:07 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
You're welcome.
>On Thu, 15 May 2008 03:36:20 -0400, the following appeared
>in sci.skeptic, posted by "V-for-Vendicar"
><Justice@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>
>Just a note: I believe your X-axis should be sunspot count,
>not CO2.
>
>>
>>"0BZN0" <0BZN0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>> Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus Geology, Western Wa****ngton
>>> University, author of 8 books, 150 journal publications with focus on
>>> geomorphology; glacial geology; Pleistocene geochronology;
environmental
>>> and engineering geology.
>>
>> Easterbrook is fond of claiming that there is a strong correlation
between
>>sunspot numbers and global
>>average temperatures.
>>
>> Here is the data. No Correlation.
>>
>>View with mono spaced font.
>>
>> No correlation between sunspot number and global average
temperature
>> 1958 -> 2007
>> |
>> |
>> | *
>> |
>> | * * *
>> | * *
>> |
>> | * *
>> |
>>^|
>>T| *
>>e| *
>>m| *
>>p| * *
>>e|
>>r| * *
>>a| *
>>t| o
o
>>u| oo oooo o ooo o oo o oo oooo oo o ooo
>>r| * * * *
>>e| *
>> | * * * *
>> | *
*
>> | * * *
>> | * * *
>> | * *
>> | *
>> | *
>> | * *
>> |
>> | *
>> | *
>>
+-----------------------CO2->----------------------------------------------
>> * = Data
>> 0 = Computed Regression
>>
>>Y = Mx+B
>>M = 4.976998E-05 B = 14.18044
>>Correlation Coefficient .01161709
>>
>>
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
|
