Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Investments > Financial Planning > Re: Annuities.....
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 34 Topic 4074 of 4232
Post > Topic >>

Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?

by "Cal" <cal-lester@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 29, 2008 at 04:50 AM

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C8910D.B8284B70
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=20
>=20
>=20
> If I were you, I would not pay much attention to the financial=20
> stability of that particular company, nor to the "may lose money"=20
> disclaimer, but instead would focus on that extraordinary $6600 in=20
> commissions and ask for convincing evidence that the monetary return=20
> from the annuity would justify such an expense.=20

    Lets clear up a few points here. That alleged $6,600 in commision is
   NOT the same as a commssion payable on the purchase of a stock ! ! ! =
!

    It is a commission paid to the seller by the Carrier, from thier =
General Funds.
    It is NOT DEUCTED from from the purchase price...................
    Instead, normally, the entire amount is credited to the Cash Value =
Account.
   and earnes a stipulated (good or bad) Interest Rate.
    The ONLY way that one can LOSE money on the purchase purchase of ANY
   Annuity, is to surrender that Annuity EARLY. Thier is a Surrender =
Charge, very
   similar to one found on the issue of any CD.......................




Of course, that=20
> evidence will not be forthcoming. She might hear something like "But=20
> this is an excellent fund. It has done great in the past ...", etc.,=20
> etc. But how many thousands of times has that been said.=20


    MOST (but not all) Annuities are INTERST EARNING instruments, and
  are NOT invested in any fund. Therefore there are NO "Up's & Down's."

The chances=20
> are that she would come out far better by leaving the money where it=20
> is. The fact is that by moving the funds into a new product with a=20
> $6600 cost just for making the move, she would be taking a risk and a=20
> gamble far larger than the gamble that the new fund, or any fund, "may =

> lose money" because of market fluctuations.



  As I have stated above, GENERALY speaking there is NO COST involved
 in the purchase of an ANNUITY....................


 Cal Lester  CLU


------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C8910D.B8284B70
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4>&nbsp;<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; If I were you, I =
would not=20
pay much attention to the financial <BR>&gt; stability of that =
particular=20
company, nor to the "may lose money" <BR>&gt; disclaimer, but instead =
would=20
focus on that extraordinary $6600 in <BR>&gt; commissions and ask for =
convincing=20
evidence that the monetary return <BR>&gt; from the annuity would =
justify such=20
an expense. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT><FONT size=3D5> Lets clear =
up a few=20
points here. That alleged $6,600 in commision is</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4><FONT size=3D5>&nbsp;&nbsp;<STRONG> NOT</STRONG> the =
same as a=20
commssion payable on the purchase of a stock ! !</FONT> ! !</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT><FONT size=3D5>It is a =
commission paid=20
to the seller by the Carrier, from thier General Funds.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT><FONT size=3D5> It is NOT =
DEUCTED from=20
from the purchase price...................</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT><FONT size=3D5>Instead, =
normally, the=20
entire amount is credited to the Cash Value Account.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D5>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;and earnes a stipulated (good or =
bad)=20
Interest Rate.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT><FONT size=3D5>The ONLY =
way that one=20
can LOSE money on the purchase purchase of ANY</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D5>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Annuity, is to surrender that =
Annuity EARLY.=20
Thier is a Surrender Charge, very</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D5>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;similar to one found on the issue =
of any=20
CD.......................</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4>Of course, that <BR>&gt; evidence will not be =
forthcoming. She=20
might hear something like "But <BR>&gt; this is an excellent fund. It =
has done=20
great in the past ...", etc., <BR>&gt; etc. But how many thousands of =
times has=20
that been said. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT><FONT size=3D5>MOST (but =
not all)=20
Annuities are INTERST EARNING instruments, and</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D5>&nbsp; are NOT invested in any fund. Therefore there =
are NO=20
"Up's &amp; Down's."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4>The chances <BR>&gt; are that she would come out far =
better by=20
leaving the money where it <BR>&gt; is. The fact is that by moving the =
funds=20
into a new product with a <BR>&gt; $6600 cost just for making the move, =
she=20
would be taking a risk and a <BR>&gt; gamble far larger than the gamble =
that the=20
new fund, or any fund, "may <BR>&gt; lose money" because of market=20
fluctuations.<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4>&nbsp; </FONT><FONT size=3D5>As I have stated above, =
GENERALY=20
speaking there is NO COST involved</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D5>&nbsp;in the purchase of an=20
ANNUITY....................</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D5></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4>&nbsp;Cal Lester&nbsp; CLU</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D4></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0032_01C8910D.B8284B70--

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators
strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond.  For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM
THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on
the
Newsgroup.
 




 34 Posts in Topic:
Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
V <vfr44@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-03-28 14:13:26 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
Justin <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-03-28 14:27:53 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
joetaxpayer <joetaxpay  2008-03-28 14:55:15 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
Don <dwzimm@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-28 15:40:25 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
"Cal" <cal-l  2008-03-29 04:50:11 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
"Mark Freeland"  2008-03-29 10:34:59 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
Don <dwzimm@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-29 16:06:02 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
Thumper <jaylsmith@[EM  2008-04-05 20:45:54 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
"Cal" <cal-l  2008-04-06 06:11:49 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
Douglas Johnson <post@  2008-04-06 15:25:52 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
Don <dwzimm@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-06 17:04:10 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
"Elle" <hond  2008-04-06 18:22:07 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
Douglas Johnson <post@  2008-04-06 19:16:50 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
"Mark Freeland"  2008-03-28 17:10:21 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
Ron Rosenfeld <ronrose  2008-03-29 15:15:10 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
Dave Dodson <dave_and_  2008-03-30 00:29:03 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-04 15:26:03 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-04 15:44:17 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
"Elle" <hond  2008-04-04 18:28:40 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
Don <dwzimm@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-04 20:02:04 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-08 10:37:53 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
"HW \"Skip\&quo  2008-04-08 12:50:37 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
"Elle" <hond  2008-04-08 12:50:41 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-08 10:50:22 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
Don <dwzimm@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-08 11:30:32 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-08 10:50:39 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-08 11:45:14 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-08 12:42:01 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-08 13:35:12 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-08 14:35:04 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-08 14:45:10 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-08 14:45:14 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
"Elle" <hond  2008-04-09 04:10:52 
Re: Annuities...are they a crap shoot?
kastnna <kastnna@[EMAI  2008-04-09 10:20:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 6 12:27:39 CDT 2008.