Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Investments > Financial Planning > Re: multi-asset...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 5 Topic 4130 of 4232
Post > Topic >>

Re: multi-asset managers

by TB <borekfm@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 1, 2008 at 10:04 PM

beliavsky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> banks have recently raised money by selling convertibles, preferred
> stock, and straight debt, as well as common stock. Suppose a manager
> is bullish on a company that has all of these types of securities
> outstanding. Buying common stock might not be the best trade.

I agree that the M* "style box" confines, and the resulting realities of 
the market for mutual funds, probably present obstacles for active 
managers who have good ideas about how to manage a more diversified 
****tfolio. I am not aware of funds looking specifically for the 
situations you describe, but you might find one in the more flexible 
categories like asset-allocation funds, balanced funds, or even the 
income-focused funds (that M* often categorizes as "moderate 
allocation"). These categories include actively managed funds that might 
identify a "pricing op****tunity" in one of several asset classes and be 
able to act on it.

But it seems the manager-selection problem is amplified, and that's the 
main issue (identifying a good manager before the fact). Let's assume 
the approach is valid...still, you would need a fund manager that is 
both a good stock manager and a good bond manager, and who can evaluate 
effectively the pricing discrepancies across the different asset 
classes, in particular with the relatively unusual situations where 
there are multiple securities to choose from.

And ultimately the returns are going to be driven more by the top-level 
asset allocation, rather than the ability to identify the "best" 
security to buy for a given company. That seems like the chasing-nickels 
part of the decision, but the fact that a dollar landed in bonds instead 
of stocks would be more of a factor to the expected returns, so more 
im****tant to the investor.

I think it's interesting as a strategy for an investor to implement, but 
  difficult for an investor to find in a manager. The returns are going 
to be very hard to evaluate...what would you benchmark against, to 
assess whether a given fund has produced above-average returns?

-Tad

--------------------------------------
Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators
strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond.  For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM
THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on
the
Newsgroup.
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
multi-asset managers
beliavsky@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-01 10:23:57 
Re: multi-asset managers
TB <borekfm@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-01 22:04:31 
Re: multi-asset managers
dumbstruck <dumbstruc@  2008-05-02 05:48:52 
Re: multi-asset managers
"Mark Freeland"  2008-05-03 08:50:45 
Re: multi-asset managers
Will Trice <wtrice@[EM  2008-05-08 19:59:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 6 16:07:45 CDT 2008.