Flasherly <gjerrell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:584e4ad3-9f20-4b5f-9a8a-ad25074a49bf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> And reason probably why he hasn't been arrested. Buffett's also
> outspoken, and though I wouldn't as much follow, as note his presence
> in the news, I can't really imagine him addressing weak market
> efficiency other than with disdain;- semistrong, strong, yes --
> appearing as much a proactive investor type. Because Fema offers
> proof across averages, information is a condition within fair
> valuation, doesn't discount a fringe range in following the anomaly,
> such as Buffet's currency movements from a few years ago. FLVCX's
> leveraging is another -- 'it only takes the right one out of seven
> picks. . .the sky's the limit.' Even from a vague recollection of a
> study in anomalousness of risk *****sment across psychological
> profiles, risk-prone personalities derived greater returns. Small
> wonder, more of recent reading, that the fear operative manifest in
> investors across normal distributions is twice a negative perception
> upon encountering risk loss, than a positive perception of profit
> reinforcement. As for weak/semistrong, possibly there's a gradient
> over historical posturing, much as can be expected from the fund
> industry in a sup****tive vein of dollar-cost-averaging into a weak
> position, for gradating subsequently across and at some greater
> frequency, into active positions of periodic balancing derived from
> semistrong information. Still, in as much noise for a likelihood and
> greater state of weak investors comprising non-institutional
> investors, yet perhaps interestingly apart from what might an average
> profile from the 70s imply, compared conceivably for a greater ten-
> fold market volume trading accounts now, and what forty years is worth
> to a semistrong presence in numbers.
IWAWTPIICUI (I Would Agree With This Post If I Could Understand It)
---
William Ernest Reid
Post count: 923
|
