On Mar 28, 3:40 pm, yaak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Nothing rivals Obama's racism.
Ha Ha Ha ! ! !
Yeah, right! Except maybe your own.
(Dude, you slip is showing
(under your white hooded robe.)
The good news is, all this asshattery has FINALLY put the lie to
"Obama is a Muslim" bull****.
By now everybody in the freakin' world knows of the Reverend Wright,
and that Obama attends a Christian Church.
So, what's a good Christian to do when a religious leader says or does
something wrong?
Why, leave the church, of course.
Hannity says so. Get packin' !!
=========================
New Rule: Catholics Must Get Up Out of the Pew and Walk Out of the
Church Forever
Bill Maher
When Barack Obama didn't hear Reverend Wright say those awful things
about America, he still should have rushed the stage, smite Reverend
Wright with the cross, and left the church. If there's anything the
right wing can agree on, it's that. And that gays are going to hell,
right after they suck them off in the air****t bathroom.
But it raises an obvious question, one that I haven't heard asked,
which is strange because it's so obvious: If you leave a church when
the head of the church says bad things about America, what do you do
when your church hierarchy is caught up in a systematic and decades-
long *** abuse scandal? And did I mention the people being ***ually
abused were children? Hundreds of them?
How about when the head of that church, or Pope, associated with and
promoted members of the clergy who not only facilitated the ***ual
abuse and rape of hundreds and hundreds of children, but engaged in a
decades-long cover-up of those crimes?
Reverend Wright associated with Farrakhan. The Pope works with
Cardinal Law. Which is worse? Isn't it the man who shuffled "priests"
like Shanley and Geoghan and many others from parish to parish with
the full knowledge of their crimes, and then claimed he had no idea?
Yes, by Sean Hannity's own logic, Catholics like him, en masse, would
be expected to abandon their church. Which shouldn't be a problem,
because they wor****p Reagan anyway.
COLMES: Then shouldn't John McCain say he doesn't sup****t the views of
a man who makes anti-Catholic statements?
OBENSHAIN: He did, I believe. He said I'm not--I don't agree with
everything -- a
COLMES: And Obama says he does not sup****t anti-Semitism, as expressed
by Louis Farrakhan.
HANNITY: Leave the church.
Well, what about it, Sean? Shouldn't you leave your church? I mean,
like, five years ago?
And since you haven't, how do we know you're not also a secret child
****er? Again, just using your logic:
HANNITY: ...What if he really deep down in his heart thinks like
Pastor Wright?
LUNTZ: It's not for anyone to answer that question.
HANNITY: Well, is that dangerous for this country? I think that would
be dangerous. That would mean we would have -- if he agreed with
Wright, and I don't know that he does, but if he did, that would mean
a racist and an anti-Semite would be president of the United States.
Side note: Does it occur to anyone that, for the past five years, the
nuts every politician has been busy distancing themselves from--
Reverend Wright, Reverend Falwell, Reverend Hagee, Reverend Haggard,
Reverend Robertson--are all, you know, reverends?
Why don't we just go back to the days when politicians kept their
religions to themselves? Wasn't that better?
http://www.236.com/blog/w/bill_maher/new_rule_catholics_must_get_up_5510.php
|
