Re: For Discussion: GW

Olneyboys@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Trailer Trash) wrote in news:9559-47F98E32-1450
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> note: this stock was culled from a 2005 stock search
> 
> HOWEVER: Mikey gets gets full and unequivical credit for the stock 
> symbol's recognition in mis, the usenet and the world 
> 
> 
> Whoa, what did I ever do to you, ausound?
> 
> 

> I know its underperformed. 

> Why the personal attack? 

hyperbole: yes
attack : no

as for the stocks underperformance
you can thank management's rape and pillage for that
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/it?s=GW

the underperformance is of course relative to the life cycle of the stock 
itself
if you'd have bought in 1999 you'd have been a seller at the end of 2005 
beginning of 2006 as it pretty much tested it's all time high
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=GW&t=my&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=

you're not going to see any "to da moon" reversals in GW any time soon 
certainly not while they ride out their current super competitive 
business environment

but I think one might be able to play the oscillations of a $5-$7 trading 
range going forward
ahh...could be $4-6... but whatever... you see the picture