adam russell <adamrussell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>> adam russell <adamrussell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>> adam russell <adamrussell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>>>> Everyone that works for a living loses wages to a degree depending
on how distant they are from the illegal jobs
>>>>> market.
>>>> Nope, professionals most obviously arent affected at all
>>>> and get to employ the illegals to do the menial work like
>>>> the lawns, wiping kids arses, cleaning the house, etc etc etc.
>>>> Its nothing like as black and white as you claim.
>>> I never said it was black and white,
>> That para of yours now at the top is just that.
>>> I said everyone is affected to a degree depending on how close they
are to the job market that the illegals work.
>> And that is just plain wrong, as I rubbed your nose in.
>>> Lawyers are so distant that the effect is not noticable, obviously.
>> Pity about cops, teachers, govt employees that deal with immigrants,
>> most obviously with those dealing with foreigners at air****ts, etc etc
etc.
>>> Farmworkers are affected more than anyone else
>>> because they are right in the labor market affected.
>> Yes, SOME are affected, most obviously with the dregs of the labor
market, as I said.
>> The problem is your silly claim that EVERYONE THAT WORKS FOR A LIVING
is affected.
>> That is just plain wrong, hordes of them arent affected at all in the
wages they get most
>> obviously with the bulk of the professions and even those like teachers
and cops.
>>> Those are the two ends of the spectrum. Everyone in between is
affected more or less depending on where they are in
>>> the market.
>> Wrong, hordes dont have their wages affected at all, most obviously
with teachers and cops.
> We disagree here.
Your problem.
> I claim that teachers and cops are somewhat affected
They actually end up with better wages.
In the case of the teachers, because there are more brats to teach.
In the case of the cops, more criminals to deal with, quite a bit of the
time on overtime etc.
> and you claim they are not affected at all.
> The basis for my claim is in the logic I presented
You didnt present a shred of 'logic' with those two groups and their
wages.
> and the basis of your claim is simply your say-so.
You're lying, as always.
|
