On Apr 13, 11:59 am, Deadrat <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Transition Zone <mogu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
innews:5a39c978-d7b3-4877-905d-2b8232c481d9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Apr 12, 3:41 pm, Deadrat <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Transition Zone <mogu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >> innews:ee07bc2a-443c-4ee0-838d
> > -a6443cf51...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > On Apr 12, 12:09 am, Deadrat <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> Transition Zone <mogu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >> >>
innews:dead8a32-f799-43d5-8059-20a7bba9a2be@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> com
>
> >> >> > On Apr 11, 4:58 pm, Deadrat <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> yaak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in
> >> >> >> news:2b3f506a-dd89-436c-8e58-efa6cb2cb7b8
> >> >> >> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> >> > On Apr 9, 7:32 pm, Deadrat <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> Transition Zone <mogu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >> >> >> >> news:1be09fdd-8c0b-
> >> >> >> 4099-
> >> >> >> >> bdd5-39173fca9...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >> >> >> > On Apr 8, 9:46 am, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> Polack is a slur even in Poland. Right Kent?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> But my impression is that "Jewry" is not in and of itself
> >> >> >> >> >> a slur. In the past there was even advocacy about
> >> >> >> >> >> "freeing Soviet Jewry". It did not seem like a slur.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Kentislawa Willenski's "pseudo intellectualism"
> >> >> >> >> >> where his need for a Polska to English dictionary
> >> >> >> >> >> p***** as erudition is absurd.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> "Political Correctness" is an ULTRALIBERAL thing anyway.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Variations on a word that means black from LATIN ORIGINS
> >> >> >> >> >> have taken on a societal context as a slur. That is a
> >> >> >> >> >> done deal.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Variations on language that is shorthand for
> >> >> >> >> >> Jewish dias****a, "Jewry" have not yet
> >> >> >> >> >> become inherantly seen as a slur, but the
> >> >> >> >> >> "political correctness" drift may eventually
> >> >> >> >> >> make that the case.
>
> >> >> >> >> > Aptly put. If so, news re****ts of abuse of the word by
> >> >> >> >> > higher-ups would abound. As they have.
>
> >> >> >> >> There are no news re****ts.
>
> >> >> >> > You're wrong. Again.
>
> >> >> >> You're lying. Again. You've cited *one* news re****t about a
> >> >> >> complaint.
>
> >> >> > Then they are lying ??
>
> >> >> No, I'll accept their re****t as accurate. You're citing one
> >> >> re****t and expanding it to multiple re****ts.
>
> >> > No, 've cited more than one re****t.
>
> >> You're cited the interview in the Oregon paper from 2003, and an
> >> ABC News blog about the interview.
>
> > Yes, and "The Hill" congressional newspaper.
>
> >> >> >> In any case, "jewry" isn't a slur. It's used by Jews to
> >> >> >> describe populations of Jews.-
>
> >> >> > Its a term that appears on Hate Websites. So it is a slur
>
> >> >> I'll repeat my question, which you've never answered: If "Hate
> >> >> Websites" use the words "ice cream," will stop buying Ben and
> >> >> Jerry's?
>
> >> > If outcry amongst pressure groups and news re****ts is strong
> >> > enough.
>
> >> Well, at least you're consistent. Ignorant and absurd. But
> >> consistent.
>
> > Yes, a lot like the the whole country and the congress itself.
>
> > (follow the leader, right ??)
>
> I think that about sums up your position.
I merely answered the ice-cream question. Then, you walk away angry.
Angry, probably because you decided upon sup****ting an inexperienced
candidate.
(you don't need me to tell you - by now - that Obama and his team are
inexperienced and unfit to serve)
But, you're still angry - so you hurl crazy insults and accusations at
me, instead of addressing the facts.
(ahhh, the Obamania of it all)
Since you don't refute my answer above, then your view of McPeak is
probably that all this craziness coming from him & his campaign
actually helps Obama and him when he uses that slur, right ??
> >> >> Why would you conclude that "Hate Websites" get to determine what
> >> >> names Jews find acceptable?
>
> >> > I never said that.
>
> >> Just a few lines above. See it? I'll repeat it for you:
>
> > You're quite observant. I said that, but not "Hate Websites get to
> > determine what names Jews find acceptable?"
> >> <quote>
> >> Its a term that appears on Hate Websites. So it is a slur
>
> </quote>
>
> Oh, sorry. The words are not yours, but the conclusion is. The term
> appears on "Hate Websites. So it is a slur." So: Thus, As a
> Consequence, If It Appears, Then.
No one would say it around people who'd be offended by it.
> > And it is a slur.
>
> What does the Harman Institute have to say? I'll take their word over
> "Hate Websites." Why won't you?-
So, what do they have to say about Obama's latest, huh ??
(hehe)
|
