ichorwhip <ichorwhip@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:5dbe6b17-6d39-44df-a0aa-8ea616728bb6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Fired across AMK's bough no less! Rally the troops! Huzzah! Huzzah!
Stanley Kubrick would have loved stock discussions in a movie
theater showing one of his movies...
> BTW stock guys, not including your/our rabid pest, what do you think
> about GE? Good for the long term or not?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! What're gonna use to buy GE
stock with, your daily haul of aluminum cans you take to the
recycling center?
And you asked in the wrong group! There are very few if any
stock traders here, just fake Forex and (now) fake commodity
traders who defiantly refuse to post their fake trades in the
correct newsgroup. You could probably find more knowledgeable
people about stocks in the Kubrick group, since I am there,
and actually know when Nixon was president and how big
a "quintillion" is, unlike the hostile seniles in the stocks group...
And since you didn't ask, I personally generally don't
"do" conglomerates...not that they're necessarily bad
(but they are NOT typically the highest performers in any
given year), it's just too difficult to pick apart all the various
businesses in most cases...
> "It wasn't me, brother, sir. Speak up for me, sir, for I'm not so bad.
> I was led on by the treachery of others, sir."
You're so unoriginal...I just used that quote. However, you can
redeem your creativity if you can write a laughably fake hog belly
trade...
---
William Ernest Reid
Post count: 1077
|
