What ever this has to do with wildlife escapes me. I was looking fo a site
about animals, why are you posting so much about anything but rec
wildlife?
Am I missing something?
<mvmimi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:yv0800011046428425@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -=. how and why did it start? -=
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> The harassment didn't start by itself, so someone must have been. there
at
> the outset to give it a firm push and set. the "animals" after me. It
> looks
> as if I was set up in. June 1990, and the timing indicates someone from
> university was. responsible.
>
>>One thing which has been missing from. this discussion is this simple
>>prognosis: that maybe he is right and that, despite his. admitted
>>mental condition, there really is a campaign. against him organised by
>>now-influential ex-students. of his university.
>
> In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a. letter from
> someone
> who had known me. for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out
his
> welcome with random precision" (from the Pink. Floyd song). Freeman went
> on
> to say to the writer "that's a hell of a letter you. wrote there". The
> indication is strongly that people I had. parted from soon before nursed
a
> grudge against me and were trying. to cause trouble for me.
>
> The suggestion is that Freeman. might have shown the letter to other
> people,
> and things could have snowballed from. there. Right from the start the
> real
> source (security services. presumed) didn't announce themselves as the
> origin, but let the "talkers", the radio DJs,. believe that they were
the
> originators.. Think about it; if you announce, "we're MI5 and we have a
> campaign against this bloke" then people might not. go along with it;
but
> if
> you say, "everyone else is getting at. this bloke because he 'deserves'
> it"
> then people will. join in with fewer qualms.
>
>>Why would "they" wish to assassinate your. character?
>
> It's the classic case of hitting a cripple to prove. you're stronger.
Why
> would. the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and
> more
> than. six years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because
they
> are motivated by. people who knew me at university and feel personal
> animosity; because they knew me to. be emotionally weak, and it is in
the
> nature of bullies. to prey on those known to be weak; and because they
can
> rely on the complicity of the establishment, which the security.
services
> manipulate and derive funding from. This. is England's biggest
humiliation
> today, and the British security services. are intent on preventing their
> humiliation becoming reality. by continuing their campaign of attempted
> murder. to suppress the truth from becoming public.
>
> 488
>
|
