Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Play Stock Market Games
Fantasy Stock Picking Contest

Investments > Investing Science > TURMEL: First m...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 6084 of 17599
Post > Topic >>

TURMEL: First meeting in Dufferin-Peel-Wellington-Grey

by bc726@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Turmel) Mar 11, 2005 at 07:29 PM

JCT: And I hadn't been invited and I hadn't attended. 
Dominic Gravel didn't get out of jail on Tuesday morning so 
I had no ride to the Caledon East Community Centre meeting 
that I had also not been invited to attend. 

I also decided to skip the third meeting I had not been 
invited to attend at Wellington Heights Secondary School, 
Mount Forest on Thursday March 10th. Actually, this is only 
the second "High School" meeting I was ever not invited to. 
The other was in Hamilton West decades ago. Tough. Maybe 
they lost more by not getting a chance to hear the Guinness 
Record candidate than I lost by not getting a chance to make 
another Guinness Record speech. 

So here's the Orangeville Citizen re****t:

>http://www.citizen.on.ca/
>Orangeville Citizen - Your Community Newspaper 
>Vol. 31 No. 25 Thursday, March 10, 2005 

Candidates queried on greenbelt, farming, health care 
By John Edwards 

JE: The first all-candidates night for the March 17 byelection 
was a good-natured, tightly managed affair that generated 
heat if not light, and was served up by two of the seven 
participants with a generous dash of humour. 

JCT: They call it an "all-candidates" meeting without the 
organizers having invited all the candidates.  

JE: The laughs were mostly courtesy of Bill Cook, a Grey 
County farmer who's running for the Representative Party, 
and Jim MacIntosh, representing Phillip Bender, candidate 
for the Libertarian Party. 

JCT: And the winner in the "Who got the most laughs" 
category (without Turmel) are..." Jim McIntosh is one of the 
Libertarians I tried to explain LETS provincial bonds but 
who, after I had announced I wanted to re-register the 
Libertarian party, came together with the other older 
members to re-register it before I could and thus prevent me 
from taking it into the last general election. He can boast 
he helped his party stay impotent in the last election.

JE: Seven of the eight candidates who will be on the ballot 
March 17 showed up for the debate: John Tory of the 
Progressive Conservative Party; Bob Duncanson of the Liberal 
Party, Lynda McDougall of the New Democratic Party, Frank de 
Jong of the Green Party, Paul Micelli of the Family 
Coalition Party, Mr. Cook and Mr. Bender. 

The Abolitionist candidate, John Turmel, 54, of Brantford, 
says he wasn't invited to the debate. His party wants to 
abolish "interest rate slavery" and substitute a barter 
system. 

JCT: Turmel "says he wasn't invited." Didn't they check with 
the organizers to see if it was so? 

JE: Monday night's event, organized by the Greater Dufferin 
Area Chamber of Commerce, gave each candidate five minutes 
to state his or her case, then allowed for questions from 
the audience, which was heavily laced with "planted" 
questions from partisans, most directed at Mr. Tory. 
Measured by applause, the nod had to go to him, although by 
the end of the evening, they were all doing pretty well. 

JCT: This could have probably caused trouble. We don't know 
if all candidates got to comment on every question or not. 
If not, then all the questions went to the major candidates 
while the minors twiddled their thumbs. My standard practice 
is to insist on the option of commenting on all questions or 
I'll leave the stage of debate and go pass out my flyers 
telling people "I'll go back when I can answer too." Every 
time a question is not addressed to me, I'll leave the 
stage. While the other minor candidates sit there like lumps 
on a log. Last time I did that was in the Hamilton West 
provincial byelection won by Andrea Horvath last year. 

JE: The greenbelt seemed to be the most pressing issue for 
those present, at least those asking questions. Mr. 
Duncanson defended the legislation, holding that it was 
"great vision for the province." "We need to have viable 
farms as a piece of the greenbelt vision," he said. 

JCT: "We need to have..." but no "how." 

JE: "The Tories would pave it, we want to save it." He noted 
that David Suzuki, perhaps Canada's most prominent 
environmentalist, was in favour of the plan. Audience 
response to that statement was less than warm: "Where does 
David live?" someone yelled. 

Mr. de Jong, on the other hand, felt the greenbelt didn't go 
far enough: "It should extend right from Ottawa to Windsor, 
and include all of southern Ontario," he said. 

JCT: "It should"... but no "how." 

"If things continue the way they are going now, we are going 
to pave over all of the land from Toronto to Collingwood." 
Mr. de Jong also suggested land-planning decisions should be 
made by local governments and the Ontario Municipal board 
should be abolished. 

Mr. Cook, who lives near Owen Sound, says the greenbelt 
should be scrapped: "It's not going to save prime number one 
and two land at all," he said. "We need an Ontario 
constitution that enshrines the rights of landowners." 

JCT: "should be" and "we need" but no "how." 

For the Libertarians, Mr. Macintosh said he also opposes the 
greenbelt plan. 

Mr. Tory felt the legislation should include a sup****t 
program for farmers and should have given them the right of 
appeal. He said the protect area was based on political 
science, not physical science. "Your lands are in the 
greenbelt before a dinner party, and mysteriously, after the 
dinner party, your lands are out of the greenbelt," he said. 
"It strikes me as strange that cemeteries and Keg 
restaurants are included. It looks at best like it was made 
up as a game of pin the tail on the donkey." 

Ms. McDougall, for the NDP, was skeptical of the 
government's actual intent: "The piece of land is going to 
be locked there, and used later for development," she said. 
"That's what it is - it's got nothing to do with political 
science at the moment, or physical science. In about 10 
years, when they decide they're going to let the ruling 
slide, we're going to see development creep up this hill." 

Mr. Duncanson jumped right on that statement: "I can't 
believe you just said that," he said. 

Mr. Micelli, for the Family Coalition, said the greenbelt is 
another example of bad government planning. 

Next to the greenbelt, the viability of Dufferin farms was 
the crowd's next major concern. 

Mr. Duncanson said he'd met with many farmers during the 
campaign and plans a round-table discussion with Minister of 
Agriculture Steve Peters next week. He said the Cabinet has 
to *****s whether current policies are helping farming's 
viability, or hindering it, but "farm viability is 
critical." 

Mr. Tory said farmers don't need plans, they need action, 
and a level playing field, to compete. "They weren't there 
(at the Queen's Park protest) because they needed a field 
trip or there was nothing to do on the farm, they were there 
because they need help now," he said. 

JCT: An expert on what's "needed" with no expertise on 
"how." 

JE: Mr. Cook said the farmers need a subsidized system like 
Quebec's. "All three of the traditional parties are full of 
bull-nutrients," he said to everyone's amusement. 

JCT: He knows what's needed too. 

JE: Mr. MacIntosh, whose party believes government should 
get out of the decision-making business altogether, feared 
for the future of food production in Ontario: "I sure as 
hell hope government doesn't take over our food supply," he 
said. "Could you imagine the waiting lines for a loaf of 
bread?" 

Mr. Micelli felt farmers need tax breaks. 

Ms. McDougall, who was raised on a farm near Alton, said 
Dufferin-Peel-Wellington-Grey's next MPP has to make some 
sort of commitment to help its farmers. "We have a 
government here that does or doesn't take farming as a 
priority," she said. "If research money is slashed, if 
systems that sup****t drainage are slashed, if hydro bills 
are increased, and if BSE money is not where it needs to be, 
we need to make sure we have someone in place that is going 
to make sure they do have that kind of commitment to the 
farmers in this area." 

JCT: She knows what "we need to make sure" of.  

Next on the crowd's agenda was health care. Mr. Tory, asked 
if the PCs plan to privatize health care, replied that the 
existing system just needs to be run in a more business-like 
way. "Of the $31 billion we are spending right now, there's 
a lot of money being wasted," he said. "I want to see 
competition in the delivery of services, but you always pay 
with your OHIP card." 

JCT: Shortage of money due to it being wasted. Bull. Too 
many committees carefully budgeting. All the politicos say 
this, then get in and can find no waste to cut. Note no 
actual proof of wastage, just the allegation.

JE: Mr. Duncanson said he wants to see health care remain 
public 

JCT: It's they're not experts on what's needed, they're 
visionaries on what they want to see.

JE: and attacked Mr. Tory for comments he made in an 
interview last year. "In the Guelph Mercury, this January, 
Mr. Tory said using 407 toll highway as a model, he would 
involve the private sector in all government projects from 
health care to highway construction," he said. "I don't want 
my health care run like the 407." 

JCT: Doesn't like how Tory would deal with not enough money 
but doesn't offer any alternative himself. 

JE: Mr. Micelli said his party has a system that would make 
health care providers more accountable. "The Family 
Coalition Party has a system called medical savings accounts 
which would make Doctors and hospitals more accountable for 
what they do," he said. 

JCT: That's what's missing. Not money but accountability. 

JE: Mr. de Jong was in favour of preventive medicine, 
including chiropractors and homeopaths. "Instead of arguing 
about waiting lists and how much money we spend in health 
care, we should start looking at prevention," Mr. de Jong 
said. "I don't know about you, but I don't want to get sick 
in the first place." 

JCT: That's my favorite line. We don't need more doctors, 
nurses, hospitals; we need less sick people. 

JE: Both Mr. Cook and Mr. MacIntosh called for more 
competition, on the basis that monopolies rarely serve 
consumers well. 

JCT: Since monopolies rarely serve well, ergo, the solution 
must be more competition. Har har har har. 

JE: "The government can't solve all of our problems - they 
are the problem," Mr. Macintosh said. He said everything the 
government runs has problems, so it should not be running 
our health care system: "We pay more and get less for what 
we spend than any other developed country." 

JCT: Sure knows the problem if not the solution. 

JE: Next was the matter of commitment to the riding: "People 
in this riding are tired of politicians coming in, cutting 
ribbons and kissing babies and expecting to get elected," a 
Shelburne man told Mr. Tory. "Will you commit to running in 
this riding in 2007 and sign a pledge confirming this 
promise?" 

JCT: The big issues in selecting the best candidate. 

JE: The PC leader stuck to his position: "Whether it's right 
or wrong, I made a commitment when I was running for the 
leader****p, when I didn't know where I was running," he 
said. "The commitment was to run in the City of Toronto, 
where I live. I made that commitment to thousands of people 
who voted for me as leader on the basis I could help restore 
the party's fortune in Toronto. I would not go back on that 
commitment. That's what politicians have done far too often 
- say one thing and do something else. I think the Liberals 
have no lesson to teach me about saying one thing and doing 
another." 

Mr. Cook was perhaps the only, but certainly the first, to 
point out that Dufferin-Peel-Wellington-Grey would no longer 
exist by the next election in 2007: "I unfortunately can't 
run in 2007," he said, "because this riding will not exist 
in 2007, it will be called Dufferin-Caledon," he said to a 
round of laughter. 

Citing the Liberals' well-known record in office, Mono 
resident Bob McCrea asked whether a vote for the Liberal 
candidate was a vote in favour of broken promises. 

To a chorus of jeers, Mr. Duncanson reminded him and the 
rest of the crowd that the Liberals inherited a $5.6 billion 
deficit. He said the government has introduced a policy that 
will see Ontario's finances of the province open to parties 
and taxpayers before an election. "That $5.6 billion was 
larger than we had been led to believe," he said. "Mr. Tory 
even admitted, in a radio interview last fall, that was 
deceitful of the Ernie Eves government to have 
misrepresented the size of that deficit," he said. "In order 
to not inflate further deficits, we had to make some tough 
decisions." 

JCT: We only stink because we inherited the stink. 

JE: Mr. Tory said he would hold the Premier accountable: 
"I'm going to fight to hold this man to account, to do the 
things he said he was going to do, to stop the promise-
breaking and get on with making some decisions and stop 
blaming the previous government," he said. "He's in 
government now." 

JCT: He promises to "fight to hold McGuinty to account." 
Fight? 

JE: Another humorous moment was provided when a member of a 
Dufferin organization asked Mr. Tory about social 
prosperity. "Fifty-four community leaders came together and 
explored how they could ensure the highest quality of life 
for residents in this county," the questioner said. "The 
group highlighted a number of strengths this county has, but 
highlighted a number of im****tant challenges. The most 
significant of those were the effect of becoming a bedroom 
community, the need for a regional economic development plan 
and the need for for some co-ordinated human service 
planning to parallel infrastructure planning, so we can have 
the services that we need in this community for the growing, 
aging and ailing population. "What do you see as the key 
ingredient needed to improve the social prosperity of 
Dufferin County, and if elected, how will you ensure these 
ingredients are put into play?" 

JCT: More money with a LETS provincial bond currency.

JE: Mr. Macintosh was the first to respond, as a hush fell 
on the audience. He tried to get his bearings, then asked 
"Could you repeat the question?" Then, on second thought, 
added, "I suspect you really don't care what my answer is," 
and passed on it. 

JCT: The Libertarian who prevented me from resurrecting the 
Libertarian party to handle this question flubs it. Har har 
har har. He stopped the only person who could handle the 
question he couldn't even remember. 

JE: The GDACC is slated to host its second meeting Monday at 
Grace Tipling Hall in Shelburne at 7:30 p.m. 

JCT: The GDACC must be the Chamber of Commerce who ran last 
Monday's meeting to which I wasn't invited. Any bets on 
whether I get invited to the meeting? Or since it looks like 
they call it an "all candidates" meeting, maybe I should go 
give them a taste of the Guinness Record show they missed so 
far.


--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm

http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel
519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
TURMEL: First meeting in Dufferin-Peel-Wellington-Grey
bc726@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-03-11 19:29:49 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 5:22:36 CST 2008.