You need to watch the movie Idiocracy ... you'd love it! <smile>
"Day Brown" <daybrown@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:9f34e58b-2751-4afc-a56d-4404a9c2512a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Waitaminit. The problem is more fundamental. The GOP wants people to
> spend their own money. But the result of that is increasing im****ts of
> plastic **** from China and increasing mountains in the landfill. And
> the reason the sheeple buy all that **** is cause the TV tells them
> they need it. But do they?
>
> They buy unhealthy food, then ***** about the high cost of healthcare.
> They'd freak out if a daughter brought home a street hood, but think
> nothing of it if thats what a welfare queen has for company, then
> ***** about the high cost of raising deadbeat bastards. It never
> occurs to them how much taxpayer money they'd save if they bribed the
> welfare queens to go to fertility clinics to get inseminated with
> promising Y chromosome lines that would produce the kind of talented
> workers they want on the job to sup****t their retirement.
>
> You wanna reduce the trade deficit you need to improve American
> innovation; innovation takes more talented workers. But you dont get
> that by letting the airheads select sperm donors from the most
> charming philanderers in the county. The politicians all go on about
> education; but you can send a son like that to school, and when he
> gets home, he's still a stupid jackass.
>
> The quality of education has improved, but the results have declined
> because its the smart women who figured out how to use birth control
> while all the stupid know how to do is produce more stupidity. Does
> anyone doubt, that had we to encouraged smart women to breed, and
> bribed the stupid not to, rather than paying them for it, that this
> economy would not be much more competitive?
>
> India and China are producing vastly more engineers and scientists;
> course, they have much larger populations to draw from. If we are to
> compete, we need to maximize the reproduction of the more promising
> DNA lines we have and minimize the less functional. Unless you wanna
> have a billion people here too?
>
> Is there anyone in economics that can ****ing add, or anyone in
> philosophy who sees which DNA lines produce genius?
|
