Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Play Stock Market Games
Fantasy Stock Picking Contest

Investments > Investing Science > Re: Buffet's Ma...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 14697 of 17599
Post > Topic >>

Re: Buffet's Market Oriented Tariff To Balance Trade Deficits

by "Sean" <Hu_cares@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 2, 2008 at 01:07 AM

<ruetheday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:f1e51cc6-7f7d-4a9f-8e82-fc8df9d48330@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Jan 30, 8:54 pm, Fred Weiss <fredwe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 11:43 am, "ruethe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <ruethe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 30, 9:16 am, Fred Weiss <fredwe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > "force a market oriented..." is a contradiction in terms. Either you
> > > have a free market or you don't - one aspect of which is free trade,
> > > i.e. no restrictions on im****ts or ex****ts.
>
> > Idiocy. There is no such thing as a "free market" where there is an
> > absence of "force". A market requires the enFORCEment of property
> > rights and contracts in order to exist.
>
> Oh please, you are equivocating here like crazy and completely
> dropping the context. Buffet was not at all upholding property rights
> and contracts in his proposal. By constraining im****ts and preventing
> free trade, he was in fact suggesting the exact opposite.

No, I'm not.  My point is that markets wouldn't exist at all if not
for government interference in the state of nature.  Claims that "free
markets" represent some sort of natural baseline and that any attempt
by government to modify the outcome represents a deviation from that
are inherently self-contradictory.

----------------------------
sean responds ..

Yes, this is correct. Why did Britain military end up in India, and
running 
the whole sub-continent, and the whole world almost?

Because men of business wanted to do business there, but there were
problems 
.... so they, the FREE MARKETEERS asked for the Govt to come over, [
spinning 
it into some great national interest thing ... you know the honour of king

and country etc ] and wanting the Govt to fix the problem with force, and 
setup Govt to keep the "people" in order ... so they could then pack the
tea 
and send it to London at a higher profit because the Govt itself carried
the 
cost of "security" for the business .... it;s alwasy been this way, it 
always will be this way .... the number of zeroes change, but that's what 
happens .... in every arena of "trade" and "human endeavour" ... there is 
always problems to be sorted. :)
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Buffet's Market Oriented Tariff To Balance Trade Deficits
"Sean" <Hu_c  2008-02-02 01:07:41 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 3:37:31 CST 2008.