"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:0d9b767b-e389-4860-a901-ec5b658b21aa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ask any of the outspoken "market" economists at Hoover, Heritage, Am.
> Enterprise, the Chicago School, von Mises, etc. a simple question,
>
> "Does free speech precede each and every free trade?"
Free trade _is_ a form of free speech. The Supreme
Court has spoken on that, when McCain-Feingold
came to the bench. That's why they nerfed it. They
had to. Free trade is protected expression.
Moreover, every free speech requires free trade. If
you can choose to trade for the website, the speech
ain't free either.
> and they'll start dodging like there's no tomorrow.
Bret confuses being ignored with dodging.
> And there is no tomorrow for the GOP.
Yeah, right. As if the Democrats just died after
they lost the House of Representatives in 1994
(for the first time in 40 years of corruption). Or
like they died after the high tax economic bust
of the late seventies.
> Eventually the funding will dry up for the "outspoken" market
> economists.
If McCain had his way, they'd certainly have
troubles in the last 60 days of an election.
---------------------------------------------------------
My name is Shrikeback, and John McCain disapproves
of this message. But old people tend to disapprove of
a lot of things.
|
