Re: Why the "Asking for a Definition" Dodge Doesn't Work

hal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 12:15:01 -0800 (PST), BretCahill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Whenever a looneytarian or other disreputable rightard trys to dodge a
>>question by asking for definitions of all the terms in the question
>>it's easy to predict that they can dodge the issue indefinitely simply
>>by asking for definitions of any new terms you introduce in your
>>answers.
>>
>>Ain't that clever?
>>
>>Ain't that slicker 'n snot.
>>
>>As it turns out, like all utterly specious dodges, it's too clever by
>>half.
>>
>>I simply tell them to craft any definitions they think will get them
>>out of their immediate jam.
>>
>>Then I wait for their next attempt to wiggle out.
>>
>>
>>Bret Cahill
> 
> 
> personally I love to ask rightards for the definition of a liberal.
> Not one of them can ever even define the term that are so apt to hate.
> And if any of them were smart enough to define it accurately, their
> feeble little brains would explode from the sudden grasping of the
> meaning.
> 
> go ahead conservatives, try to define liberal for us.  We could use a
> good laugh.

liberal: nazi.