<BretCahill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Cite?
>
> You mean on your infinite oil theory?
Fantastic argumentation, you are challenged and then not only do not
answer, you change tracks.
Utterly pathetic.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~
>
> Oil groups suffer Gulf of Mexico setback
> By Sheila McNulty in Houston
>
> Published: March 9 2008 20:47 | Last updated: March 9 2008 20:47
>
> Disappointing oil exploration results in the Gulf of Mexico are
> upsetting the hopes of US oil majors for big new findings in an area
> free from interference by foreign, state-owned oil companies.
>
> Wood MacKenzie, the energy consultancy, said in a new re****t that
> findings in the Gulf in 2007 were the lowest of the past decade. With
> a total of 553m barrels of oil equivalent, these new reserves were
> less than half of what was found in 2006.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Next question?
Yes: Do you take your prescribed meds?
--
regards , Peter B. P. http://macplanet.dk
Wa****ngton D.C.: District of Criminals
"I dont drink anymore... of course, i don't drink any less, either!
|
