Re: Leftists knocking Friedman ?

On Mar 12, 8:11 pm, Vide...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

>  and if the certain players have a lot of private property, then the
> nanny state will spend much more time and resources protecting a small
> cabal of very wealthy players. hardly a free market, hardly laissez
> faire.

More speculation.  A protection of property rights is a benefit to all
that have property.  Those with little - or no - property are still
protected from force or fraud (the only protections necessary to
maintain personal liberty).  This is possible with a separation of
economy and government.

Your notion that such protection is meant to be only for a small group
of "players" is nothing more than your imagination.  Twisting concepts
(laissez faire) to suit your empty assertion does nothing for your
argument.