On Mar 24, 7:52 pm, bill <ford_prefec...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Or you could read the strategy for dealing with AQ that clinton
> handed down. basically it says "ask pakistan and SA nicely to deal
> with AQ for you and hope they do".
>
You mean bombing medicine factories in the Sudan and flaring anti-US
sentiment? You mean doing absolutely ZIP about American war****ps like
the Cole being attacked? You mean cutting intelligence to the bone so
that we had no assets that were people? You mean making infective
missile strikes at a spot in Afghanistan where Bin Laden once was? You
mean calling off a mission to capture Bin Laden because a plane was
parked on a nearby runway that had a UAE identification number on it?
Face it 9/11 was caused by the bombing of a medicine factory in the
Sudan that had suspicious at best links to terrorism and the COMPLETE
inactivity of responding to the Cole incident. We can the COMPLETE
ineffective handling of fighting AQ under Clinton. Yes I realize they
caught the guy from the first WTC bombing but that was the only
sucesss. The blood of the people who died on 9/11/01 rest solely on
Bill Clinton's hands.
> > > Besides, AQ is only the smallest tip of a vast popular movement.
> > > really, we're at war with islam and have been since biblical times.
>
> > Who's "we"?
>
> Everyone on the planet that is NOT islamic.
>
We are not at war with everyone on the planet nor have we been at war
with Islam since Biblical times. ISLAM DID NOT EXIST IN BIBLICAL
TIMES!!! We are not at war with Islam at all. Calling searching for AQ
members a fight against Islam is like calling a search for people who
bomb abortion clinics a fight against Christianity. Both groups have a
warped sense of religion that only Pope Urban and Saladin could agree
with.
> > >> How is the role of the Democrats relevant to his decision to invade
at
> > >> all,
> > >> except insofar as they were insufficiently opposed to Bush on the
issue,
> > >> which hardly bolsters your argument?
>
Very relevant. They cut the military to the bone under Clinton and
were the reason Rummy had to go war without the equipment he would
have liked to had for the armed forces. Lack of things like armored
vehicles were not Bush's fault they were the fault of eight years of
Clinton fighting to cut the US armed forces.
> > > Please. The democrats are not the least bit better in any
> > > respect. They are BOTH thugs, thieves and liars.
>
> > Not compared to the brown****rt Republicans, who impeached a sitting
> > president for petty infractions,
Sorry but perjury is not a petty infraction. It is my belief Ken Starr
was sympathetic to the Democrats or influenced by them. Clinton should
have been ARRESTED for the White Water Scam and thrown out of office
for scamming real estate. Starr choose the weaker case but more head
line grabbing case to pursue. Starr was an idiot or wanted to present
the weakest case possible .
stole an election in 2000,
Sorry no election was stolen. You can not recount and change the
standard of what is a vote until you finally win. The SC stopped the
recounts because wanted to change how the count was done every time he
recounted and STILL came up short.
> > <yawn> To repeat myself, if you have organization, you can easily get
guns.
> > If you don't have organization, you're screwed. Period.
>
> Well, if you were right then you'd have a point. didn't work
> very well for the jews in germany, or the ukrainians under stalin, or
> the chinese under mao. but hey, maybe this time will be different.
Russians, Germans, and Chinese did not have second amendment rights
and a sufficiently wealthy population to purchase arms and
ammunition.
|
