Re: Housing starts a.k.a. land attrition

"Tadej Brezina" <tadej_usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:47f0e110$0$12126$3b214f66@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Matt W. Barrow wrote:
>
>> "George Conklin" <nil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:13uv52d9amq723@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>"jloomis" <jloomis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:fsmqlq022eq@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>>The real problem is the "addiction to oil" and our being brought up in
a
>>>>world where there was "no limit" on the supply of gasoline at the 
>>>>station.
>>>
>>>   Modern economies do not relay on the human back to do the heavy 
>>> lifting.
>>>We do not rely on horses to move produce.  So?
>>
>>
>> And there is still virtually "no limit". The US has enough reserves to 
>> last 100 years, a lot longer than it will take for a superior motive 
>> technology to arises.
>
> Enough reserves of what? Crude oil? So why has since the mid 70ies the
USA 
> become a dramatic net-im****ter of crude oil?
> Is that tactics to misleda everybody while you're piling up the homeland

> oil in secret shelters?

[See comment at bottom]
>
> The earth has hardly the reserves to incur the last 100 years' 
> exploitation and it's progression for another 100 years.

Can you back that up? Should I waste my time showing the billions of
barrels 
of known reserves?

Indeed, based on your arguments, it would be a complete waste of time and 
effort.

>> All needs be done is get Congress to quit sitting on their brains and
to 
>> tell the EnviroNazi's (yes, that's were a lot of environmental premises

>> come from) to stick it where the sun don't ****ne.
>
> From time to time some fool pops up, using the word "Nazi" in utterly 
> wrong and misconceptional ways,
> probably hardly knowing what he's talking about and the Nazi's 
> implications.

And you obviously don't know the long term history of the environmental 
movement back to Germany in the 1920's and 30's.

Now, you're demonstrating complete ignorance, so, no, I won't waste my
time.