Re: Housing starts a.k.a. land attrition

Matt W. Barrow wrote:
> "Dan Bloomquist" <public21@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:IIfIj.935$NU2.126@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Matt W. Barrow wrote:
>>> "Tadej Brezina" <tadej_usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>> news:47f0e110$0$12126$3b214f66@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> The earth has hardly the reserves to incur the last 100 years' 
>>>> exploitation and it's progression for another 100 years.
>>> Can you back that up? Should I waste my time showing the billions of 
>>> barrels of known reserves?
>> Are your 'reserves' sand oil and kerogen?
> 
> Well, no, so the rest of this tripe is of little worth.
> 
>> They have little to do with 'capacity to produce'. The ERoEI of kerogen
is 
>> almost non existent. We have peaked in natural gas production in North 
>> America so sand oil is pretty much a losing proposition. The EIA
predicts 
>> demand to go well over 100 mb/d by 2025. Where will it come from?
>>
> 
> You should not make assumptions (such as that I was talking about
kerogens), 
> but then you'd have to really THINK, not just emote.

You didn't answer the question. Where will it come from?