Re: Scientific American Article On "Market" Economists

On Apr 9, 12:25=A0pm, BretCah...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

> > > You've never been exposed to science or scientists.
>
> > > Bret Cahill- Hide quoted text -
> > Bret, I worked for several years as a Graduate Student for Danny
> > Kahneman, Nobel Prize in Economics 2002.
>
> We were discussing _physical_ scientists. =A0That was the whole point of
> the _Scientific American_ article. =A0The _physical_ scientists know the
> economic science is nonsense.
>
> > =A0I was so disgusted with the
> > experience that I walked out,
>
> So would I. =A0The Nobel Economists are without exception all frauds.
>
> > and have tended to avoid professional
> > science ever since. =A0
>
> There's your error: =A0Confusing economists with real scientists.
>
> Physical science is completely different.
>
> > He is a consummate con artist, but, at least he
> > is open about it.
>
> Only out of touch rightards like Rantdroids still parrot that
> nonsense.
>
> > My father was a Biostatistician and Epidemiologist in a number of
> > Universities and Research Institutions. =A0He didn't work too hard,
> > didn't do too much, was paid well, and liked it that way.
>
> If he taught some of his students probably saved a lot of lives.
>
> You don't need to live a hard live to do a lot of good and you don't
> need to live a good life to do a lot of evil or just be useless.
>
> > Actually Bret, I'm quite expert on science and scientists,
>
> It's easy for me to tell you've done nothing in physics or chemistry.
>
> > which is
> > why I have such contempt for them. =A0What, exactly, do you know about
> > them, other than what you read in scientific cheerleading propaganda
> > rags like Scientific American?
>
> I don't generally read _Scientific American_, although it is a good
> mag.
>
> If you had any background in science and followed it on a routine
> basis you wouldn't be saying such crazy things.
>
> Bret Cahill- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Uh...Bret...

Here's a graduate student in mathematical logic who wants to do his
thesis on some ideas I've been developing.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/49a4d4df6166a0=
8b/14d81c91acf9f081?lnk=3Dst&q=3D%22white+horse+dialogue%22+#14d81c91acf9f08=
1


Baldin Lee Pramer is fairly regular contibutor on these sites.  A
physicist who tells me he is attempting to publish a paper based on my
notion that nanotechnological approaches to controlled nuclear fusion
are likely to be the most successful, although they are not the most
popular.

Do challenge me with your expertise in physics and chemistry, Bret, if
you have any.  Which I sincerely doubt, gasbag.

By the way, my father never claimed to have saved any lives, or that
any of his students did.  But, I suppose you know more about him than
I do too.  You are a liar, Bret.  A left-wing loon, so attached to his
idols that he can't see the real world.

As I say, morons on the left, like yourself, are just as dangerous as
morons on the right.  You know nothing but your own delusions.  You
are a fool.