Re: Solution to the energy shortage?

"Ben Goren" <ben@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:1209441899_930@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>
> > Ben Goren wrote:
> >> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
> >>> Ben Goren wrote:
> >>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
> >>>>> Ben Goren wrote:
> >>>>>> Irish Mike wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Same applies to people who claim there is no God.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Which god would that be<*****SLAP>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Pick one.
> >>>>
> >>>> So, you're trying to tell us that Ra created the world?
> >>>
> >>> Am I? How did you arrive at that conclusion?
> >>
> >> Easy. I just used my superior command of the English language.
> >>
> >> Hey, it's not /my/ problem that you can't write or read worth a
> >> damn!
> >
> > Where did I claim "that Ra created the world?"
>
> Not that bright, are you?
>
> I'll spell  it out  for you. Let me  know if I  use any  words you
> don't understand.
>
> Irish  Mike  made reference<*****SLAP>

The question is where did I claim "that Ra created the world?" The
question 
is not what did someone else claim or imply or refer to.

> people  who  claim there  aren't  any
> gods. I asked him which god he  had in mind. You suggested I could
> pick a god, any god, with the obvious implication that any and all
> gods are equally valid. So, I picked a god.

Oh, so your question about me trying to tell you that Ra created the world

was your way of asserting your choice? Do you often underhandedly create 
imaginary, arse about face claims like that? Do you fear making outright 
assertions that you can be pinned down on? Hmmm? You ****ing coward.

> And now  it seems that you're  trying to back off  of your earlier
> position that all gods exist.

Why on earth would I do that? I have no problem whatsoever in asserting 
that, from a definition of God = Metaphysical X, I can give you second
order 
predicate logic sentences encoding watertight axioms and solutions that
show 
all gods that are metaphysical necessarily exist.

Do you have a problem with that? And who here is the fool, you or I?

> So, tell me. Where did you get this fantasy that you can out-argue
> a BAAWAWAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!  Knight?

Perhaps the fantasy is yours, arising from a foolhardy and mistaken belief

that you've latched onto yet another illogical frz who cannot out-argue
you.

> Because you're stumbling  so badly over  your own feet  that,

And yet it is you who makes implied assumptions from implied claims but 
doesn't state them until you're out-bluffed into a corner and forced to 
reveal your pathetic poker cards.

"So, you're trying to tell us that Ra created the world?" now becoming "I 
picked a god" being a prime example of you doing just that.

"you're trying to back off of your earlier position that all gods exist" 
being another.

> even though  I  haven't  taken  a swing  yet,  you're bleeding from
every 
> orifice.

You need to get your delusions seen to, loser. I am more than beyond your 
sub-standard little league.

Definition 1: God = Metaphysical X.
Definition 2: Metaphysical = Without physical form or substance.

Theorem: Necessarily, God exists.

"you're trying to back off of your earlier position that all gods exist"

You didn't expect anyone to step up to your atheist bull****, did you?
Hmmm? 
Oopsies!

Choke on that, atheist ****stain.

-- 
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursup****t.helpdesk

Member of:
   Usenet Ruiner List
   Top Assholes on the Net List
   Most hated usenetizens of all time List
   Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

"If it is non-empirical, then it does not exist."
"DanielSan" <danielsan1977@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> asserting that his mind does
not exist. news:IpydnUYo8ssX54zVnZ2dnUVZ_oSunZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The firmware of a router can become sick after awhile of continuous
usage." DUHane Arnold <MR. Arnold@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> giving technical advice. 
news:k96dnd110uImNojVnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]