Re: Solution to the energy shortage?

"DanielSan" <danielsan1977@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:isudnTB20faUb4rVnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>> "DanielSan" <danielsan1977@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:bqSdnWku5fpqdIrVnZ2dnUVZ_s3inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan1977@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>>> news:qumdnd0mur2pe4rVnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>> "Ben Goren" <ben@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>>>>> news:1209523445_1031@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> Hamlet's Life moaned:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I do not need to address any of your questions.
>>>>>>> O<*****SLAP>
>>>>>> HTH
>>>>>>
>>>>> Translation:  RUN AWAY!  RUN AWAY!
>>>>
>>>> "Godel was wrong."
>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan1977@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> asserting that it is he who
>>>> was "one of the most significant logicians of all time", and had
>>>> an "immense impact upon scientific and philosophical thinking in the
>>>> 20th century", not Kurt Gödel.
>>>> news:qumdnaImur0KeIrVnZ2dnUVZ_vOd
>>>>
>>> Can you show where I claim either of those quotes you say I'm
asserting?
>>
>>
>> The quoted text is a paraphrase of the extrapolated implications of
your 
>> mad assertion that "Godel was wrong."
>
> "...in this case" is the context you're missing.
>
>>
>> Proving yourself to be a total, illogical ****wit by making assertions
in 
>> the complete absence of any consideration whatsoever for the
consequences 
>> is all you have done in these threads. You have done nothing else.
>
> Except show that the axioms provided in the argument are not
sufficiently 
> self-evident and are, therefore, not true axioms.
>
>>
>> Does it come as a surprise to you that you are *****slapped for that
yet 
>> again? Hmmm?
>
> By you?  I'm not worried about being *****slapped by you.  You're a 
> small-minded plagiarist who doesn't even know what he posts.  No, I'm
not 
> really worried about what you think of me.

The work was credited immediately before it was pasted. If plagiarism were

involved it would have been immediately drawn to my attention by my auk 
colleagues, for they shall not tolerate such perfidy. I do not see anyone 
other than you and the BAAWAAAAAAAWAAAAAAH Knight of ****wittery pu****ng 
that particular barrow.

> I doubt anyone else cares what you think, either.

Note how you are attempting to minimise potential impact to yourself?
Hmmm?

>> Stiff **** for you. Enjoy your ignominy, retard.
>>
>
> Do you imagine that I have ignominy in alt.atheism (from which I post
and 
> read this)?  Or is it you that has that?  I can cobble together a poll
of 
> likely posters,

Note how you are attempting to maximise potential sup****t for yourself? 
Hmmm?

Tell me again how not worried you are.

> if you wish.

How about you post a list of names of likely posters first?

-- 
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursup****t.helpdesk

Member of:
   Usenet Ruiner List
   Top Assholes on the Net List
   Most hated usenetizens of all time List
   Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

"If it is non-empirical, then it does not exist."
"DanielSan" <danielsan1977@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> asserting that his mind does
not exist. news:IpydnUYo8ssX54zVnZ2dnUVZ_oSunZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Godel was wrong."
"DanielSan" <danielsan1977@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> asserting that he is one of
the most significant logicians of all time, not Kurt Gödel.
news:qumdnaImur0KeIrVnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The firmware of a router can become sick after awhile of continuous
usage." DUHane Arnold <MR. Arnold@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> giving technical
advice. news:k96dnd110uImNojVnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]