Re: BEFORE Trying To Simply Hike the Fuel Tax . . .

On Sat, 03 May 2008 12:15:34 -0700, HarryNadds wrote:

> On May 3, 10:11 am, BretCah...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> The deal needs to include a revenue neutral IRS rebate to cover the
>> increase in federal fuel taxes.
>>
>> The overall effect is drivers would be paid to use less fuel.
>>
>> Anyone who ****fts away from driving or at least from driving low mpg
>> vehicles would come out ahead economically and anyone who really
>> needed to drive to work or drive a truck to work would still be able
>> to afford it.
>>
>> Bret Cahill
> 
> There we go.The typical moonbat response. Mandate that the american
> people make drastic lifestyle changes instead of doing the right thing
> and drilling for oil and building refineries.Will your mandate include
> the elites in Hollywood and the limousine liberals in Wa****ngton??
> Did'nt think so.

There we go:  The usual pinhead binary brain "My way or the highway"
rightarded response to what is a rational idea.  More drilling and more
exploration are not precluded by the suggested tax and redistribution
idea. It is not one or the other.  But the rightarded can only deal with
the one or other binary decision making.

And the point was totally lost in that the "elites in Hollywood and the
limousine liberals in Wa****ngton" will be subsidizing the common people.
What we see in the response is the typical "stupidity on steroids" of the
Reich.

-- 
"I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers
of society but the people themselves; and
if we think them not enlightened enough to
exercise their control with a wholesome
discretion, the remedy is not to take it from
them, but to inform their discretion by
education." - Thomas Jefferson
http://GreaterVoice.org/extend